CF
Price
$108.21
Change
-$0.05 (-0.05%)
Updated
Jul 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.19B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ICL
Price
$5.03
Change
+$0.05 (+1.00%)
Updated
Jul 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.46B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CF vs ICL

CF vs ICL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CF vs. ICL commentary
Jul 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CF is a Buy and ICL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 02, 2026
Stock price -- (CF: $108.26 vs. ICL: $4.98)
Brand notoriety: CF: Notable vs. ICL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CF: 102% vs. ICL: 90%
Market capitalization -- CF: $16.19B vs. ICL: $6.46B
CF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $16.19B. ICL’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $6.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $56.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $9.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileICL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ICL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CF is a better buy in the long-term than ICL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ICL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ICL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CF is a better buy in the short-term than ICL.

Price Growth

CF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +5.96% price change this week, while ICL (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +0.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

CF is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

ICL is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+0.74% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CF($16.2B) has a higher market cap than ICL($6.46B). ICL has higher P/E ratio than CF: ICL (24.14) vs CF (9.33). CF YTD gains are higher at: 41.301 vs. ICL (-11.286). CF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.7B vs. ICL (1.26B). CF has more cash in the bank: 2.04B vs. ICL (581M). ICL has less debt than CF: ICL (3.15B) vs CF (3.62B). ICL (7.41B) and CF (7.41B) have equivalent revenues.
CFICLCF / ICL
Capitalization16.2B6.46B251%
EBITDA3.7B1.26B294%
Gain YTD41.301-11.286-366%
P/E Ratio9.3324.1439%
Revenue7.41B7.41B100%
Total Cash2.04B581M351%
Total Debt3.62B3.15B115%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CF vs ICL: Fundamental Ratings
CF
ICL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44100
SMR RATING
1..100
2887
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5376
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7740
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5047

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICL's Valuation (15) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CF (34). This means that ICL’s stock grew similarly to CF’s over the last 12 months.

CF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICL (100). This means that CF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICL’s over the last 12 months.

CF's SMR Rating (28) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICL (87). This means that CF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICL’s over the last 12 months.

CF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as ICL (76). This means that CF’s stock grew similarly to ICL’s over the last 12 months.

ICL's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CF (77). This means that ICL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFICL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ICL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTHS28.260.71
+2.58%
Pelthos Therapeutics Inc
CXW30.380.09
+0.30%
CoreCivic
ASND260.75N/A
N/A
Ascendis Pharma A/S
AIIO4.37N/A
N/A
Robo.ai Inc.
POAS0.28N/A
-0.36%
Phaos Technology (Cayman) Holdings Ltd.

ICL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICL has been loosely correlated with IPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICL jumps, then IPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICL
1D Price
Change %
ICL100%
-0.60%
IPI - ICL
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.92%
MOS - ICL
35%
Loosely correlated
-5.57%
CTVA - ICL
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
BIOX - ICL
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CF - ICL
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
More