CF vs KPLUY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CF is a Hold and KPLUY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileKPLUY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- KPLUY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KPLUY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KPLUY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +9.29% price change this week, while KPLUY (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was +6.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
CF is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Agricultural (+2.07% weekly)The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
| CF | KPLUY | CF / KPLUY | |
| Capitalization | 15.6B | 3.66B | 427% |
| EBITDA | 3.26B | 2.56B | 128% |
| Gain YTD | 13.701 | 9.738 | 141% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.59 | 2.25 | 471% |
| Revenue | 6.63B | 5.66B | 117% |
| Total Cash | 2.03B | 815M | 249% |
| Total Debt | 3.23B | N/A | - |
CF | KPLUY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 92 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 44 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KPLUY's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CF (50) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that KPLUY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CF’s over the last 12 months.
CF's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KPLUY (92) in the null industry. This means that CF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KPLUY’s over the last 12 months.
CF's SMR Rating (44) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KPLUY (89) in the null industry. This means that CF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KPLUY’s over the last 12 months.
CF's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KPLUY (56) in the null industry. This means that CF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KPLUY’s over the last 12 months.
KPLUY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CF (7) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that KPLUY’s stock grew similarly to CF’s over the last 12 months.
| CF | KPLUY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 62% | 12 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 76% | 12 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 82% | 12 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 72% | 12 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 64% | 12 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 76% | 21 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 73% | 28 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 67% | 12 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 63% | N/A |
KPLUY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KPLUY has been loosely correlated with NTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KPLUY jumps, then NTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KPLUY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KPLUY | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| NTR - KPLUY | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| YARIY - KPLUY | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| MOS - KPLUY | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.57% | ||
| ICL - KPLUY | 30% Poorly correlated | +3.50% | ||
| CF - KPLUY | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.25% | ||
More | ||||