CFBK
Price
$23.97
Change
+$0.25 (+1.05%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
154.55M
85 days until earnings call
IBTN
Price
$24.84
Change
+$0.36 (+1.47%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
72.13M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFBK vs IBTN

Header iconCFBK vs IBTN Comparison
Open Charts CFBK vs IBTNBanner chart's image
CF Bankshares
Price$23.97
Change+$0.25 (+1.05%)
Volume$6.23K
Capitalization154.55M
Ins
Price$24.84
Change+$0.36 (+1.47%)
Volume$200
Capitalization72.13M
CFBK vs IBTN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IBTN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFBK vs. IBTN commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFBK is a Buy and IBTN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (CFBK: $23.97 vs. IBTN: $24.84)
Brand notoriety: CFBK and IBTN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFBK: 42% vs. IBTN: 9%
Market capitalization -- CFBK: $154.55M vs. IBTN: $72.13M
CFBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $154.55M. IBTN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $72.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $173.23B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFBK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIBTN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IBTN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IBTN is a better buy in the long-term than CFBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFBK’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBTN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFBK’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IBTN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFBK is a better buy in the short-term than IBTN.

Price Growth

CFBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.00% price change this week, while IBTN (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFBK is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.47% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFBK($155M) has a higher market cap than IBTN($72.1M). IBTN has higher P/E ratio than CFBK: IBTN (9.55) vs CFBK (8.65). IBTN YTD gains are higher at: 0.280 vs. CFBK (-5.202). IBTN has less debt than CFBK: IBTN (67.6M) vs CFBK (114M). CFBK has higher revenues than IBTN: CFBK (52.5M) vs IBTN (25.4M).
CFBKIBTNCFBK / IBTN
Capitalization155M72.1M215%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.2020.280-1,858%
P/E Ratio8.659.5591%
Revenue52.5M25.4M207%
Total CashN/A7.69M-
Total Debt114M67.6M169%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFBK vs IBTN: Fundamental Ratings
CFBK
IBTN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3018
SMR RATING
1..100
5758
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5550
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7633
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFBK's Valuation (37) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IBTN (98) in the null industry. This means that CFBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than IBTN’s over the last 12 months.

IBTN's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as CFBK (30) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that IBTN’s stock grew similarly to CFBK’s over the last 12 months.

CFBK's SMR Rating (57) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as IBTN (58) in the null industry. This means that CFBK’s stock grew similarly to IBTN’s over the last 12 months.

IBTN's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CFBK (55) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that IBTN’s stock grew similarly to CFBK’s over the last 12 months.

IBTN's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFBK (76) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that IBTN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFBK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFBKIBTN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
17%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IBTN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSNGF14.25N/A
N/A
Hang Seng Bank Ltd.
NSGCF0.03N/A
N/A
NORTHSTAR GOLD CORP.
PHTCF20.52N/A
N/A
PLDT Inc.
PXMBF3.50N/A
N/A
PAXMAN AB

CFBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFBK has been loosely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFBK jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFBK
1D Price
Change %
CFBK100%
+1.05%
HBAN - CFBK
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
FCCO - CFBK
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
UCB - CFBK
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
FITB - CFBK
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
FHN - CFBK
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
More

IBTN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IBTN and BKEAF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IBTN and BKEAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBTN
1D Price
Change %
IBTN100%
N/A
BKEAF - IBTN
27%
Poorly correlated
+5.82%
VBNK - IBTN
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
CZFS - IBTN
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
CFBK - IBTN
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
HSNGF - IBTN
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More