CFCGF vs FATBB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFCGF is a Hold and FATBB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CFCGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFATBB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CFCGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FATBB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
CFCGF (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FATBB (@Restaurants) price change was -6.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.46%.
Reported Earning Dates
FATBB is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Restaurants (-2.17% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
| CFCGF | FATBB | CFCGF / FATBB | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 61.2M | - |
| EBITDA | 425M | 26.1M | 1,628% |
| Gain YTD | -9.799 | 25.801 | -38% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.13 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 8.64B | 606M | 1,425% |
| Total Cash | 1.07B | 16.8M | 6,375% |
| Total Debt | 2.33B | 1.45B | 161% |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CAPFX | 8.82 | -0.04 | -0.45% |
| Federated Hermes Capital Income F | |||
| BMECX | 14.99 | -0.14 | -0.93% |
| BlackRock High Equity Income Investor C | |||
| JGAQX | 37.61 | -0.50 | -1.31% |
| JPMorgan Value Advantage R2 | |||
| HOOTX | 31.14 | -0.66 | -2.08% |
| Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps R5 | |||
| UMPIX | 65.27 | -3.31 | -4.83% |
| ProFunds UltraMid Cap Inv | |||
CFCGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CFCGF and CBRL have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFCGF and CBRL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CFCGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFCGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CBRL - CFCGF | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.70% | ||
| BROS - CFCGF | 4% Poorly correlated | -7.23% | ||
| PTLO - CFCGF | 4% Poorly correlated | -4.40% | ||
| FATBB - CFCGF | 2% Poorly correlated | -7.41% | ||
| FWRG - CFCGF | 1% Poorly correlated | -1.98% | ||
More | ||||
FATBB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FATBB and FAT have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FATBB and FAT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FATBB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FATBB | 100% | -7.41% | ||
| FAT - FATBB | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.78% | ||
| GTIM - FATBB | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| SHAK - FATBB | 21% Poorly correlated | -12.05% | ||
| PBPB - FATBB | 20% Poorly correlated | -4.51% | ||
| NDLS - FATBB | 20% Poorly correlated | -10.43% | ||
More | ||||