CFCI
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.02 (-15.38%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
35.92M
FORA
Price
$2.26
Change
-$0.01 (-0.44%)
Updated
Sep 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
69.38M
49 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFCI vs FORA

Header iconCFCI vs FORA Comparison
Open Charts CFCI vs FORABanner chart's image
CIPHER-CORE
Price$0.11
Change-$0.02 (-15.38%)
Volume$100
Capitalization35.92M
Forian
Price$2.26
Change-$0.01 (-0.44%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization69.38M
CFCI vs FORA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FORA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFCI vs. FORA commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFCI is a Hold and FORA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CFCI: $0.11 vs. FORA: $2.26)
Brand notoriety: CFCI and FORA are both not notable
CFCI represents the Computer Communications, while FORA is part of the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFCI: 6% vs. FORA: 81%
Market capitalization -- CFCI: $35.92M vs. FORA: $69.38M
CFCI [@Computer Communications] is valued at $35.92M. FORA’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $69.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.78T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $44.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.13B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFCI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFORA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFCI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FORA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFCI is a better buy in the long-term than FORA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFCI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FORA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFCI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FORA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FORA is a better buy in the short-term than CFCI.

Price Growth

CFCI (@Computer Communications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FORA (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was -2.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +3.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +67.06%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

FORA is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+3.66% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Services to the Health Industry (+1.28% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FORA($69.4M) has a higher market cap than CFCI($35.9M). CFCI YTD gains are higher at: 450.000 vs. FORA (9.709).
CFCIFORACFCI / FORA
Capitalization35.9M69.4M52%
EBITDAN/A-231.53K-
Gain YTD450.0009.7094,635%
P/E RatioN/A66.67-
RevenueN/A25M-
Total CashN/A35.6M-
Total DebtN/A6.83M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFCI: Fundamental Ratings
CFCI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
38
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFCIFORA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FORA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KLNG2.120.08
+3.92%
Koil Energy Solutions, Inc.
TIIAY5.250.03
+0.67%
Telecom Italia S.p.A.
TRPRF15.85N/A
N/A
TC Energy Corp.
KNKZF74.80N/A
N/A
Kws Kleinwanzlebener Saatzucht AG
SRBIF3.10N/A
N/A
Serabi Gold Plc

CFCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFCI and TAOP have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFCI and TAOP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFCI
1D Price
Change %
CFCI100%
N/A
TAOP - CFCI
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.09%
LFMD - CFCI
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
URLOF - CFCI
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
FORA - CFCI
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
IDAI - CFCI
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
More

FORA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FORA and JTAI have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FORA and JTAI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FORA
1D Price
Change %
FORA100%
+1.35%
JTAI - FORA
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.07%
SEEMF - FORA
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCX - FORA
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
RELY - FORA
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
BMBL - FORA
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
More