Advertisement
CFCI vs TAOP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFCI is a Hold and TAOP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CFCI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTAOP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CFCI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TAOP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CFCI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAOP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CFCI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TAOP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CFCI (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TAOP (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.77%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.04% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CFCI | TAOP | CFCI / TAOP | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 2.15M | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | 5.96M | - |
| Gain YTD | 531.068 | -70.084 | -758% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 25.71 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 31M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 460K | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 6.8M | - |
CFCI | TAOP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 97 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 94 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CFCI's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as TAOP (34) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CFCI’s stock grew similarly to TAOP’s over the last 12 months.
CFCI's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TAOP (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CFCI’s stock grew similarly to TAOP’s over the last 12 months.
TAOP's SMR Rating (95) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CFCI (100) in the null industry. This means that TAOP’s stock grew similarly to CFCI’s over the last 12 months.
CFCI's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAOP (94) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CFCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAOP’s over the last 12 months.
TAOP's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CFCI (100) in the null industry. This means that TAOP’s stock grew similarly to CFCI’s over the last 12 months.
| CFCI | TAOP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 29% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
CFCI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CFCI and TAOP have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFCI and TAOP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CFCI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFCI | 100% | N/A | ||
| TAOP - CFCI | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
| LFMD - CFCI | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.23% | ||
| URLOF - CFCI | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
| FORA - CFCI | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.01% | ||
| IDAI - CFCI | 8% Poorly correlated | -4.53% | ||
More | ||||
TAOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TAOP and CFCI have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TAOP and CFCI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAOP | 100% | +1.88% | ||
| CFCI - TAOP | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UPBD - TAOP | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.02% | ||
| HUBS - TAOP | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| CPAY - TAOP | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
| GEN - TAOP | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
More | ||||