CFCI
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.01 (-7.14%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
URLOF
Price
$1.00
Change
+$0.09 (+9.89%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
11.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFCI vs URLOF

Header iconCFCI vs URLOF Comparison
Open Charts CFCI vs URLOFBanner chart's image
CIPHER-CORE
Price$0.13
Change-$0.01 (-7.14%)
Volume$1.2K
CapitalizationN/A
NameSilo Technologies
Price$1.00
Change+$0.09 (+9.89%)
Volume$111.03K
Capitalization11.06M
CFCI vs URLOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
URLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFCI vs. URLOF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFCI is a Hold and URLOF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CFCI: $0.13 vs. URLOF: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: CFCI and URLOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFCI: 11% vs. URLOF: 118%
Market capitalization -- CFCI: $0 vs. URLOF: $11.06M
CFCI [@Packaged Software] is valued at $0. URLOF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $11.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFCI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileURLOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFCI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • URLOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, URLOF is a better buy in the long-term than CFCI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFCI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while URLOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFCI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • URLOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, URLOF is a better buy in the short-term than CFCI.

Price Growth

CFCI (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while URLOF (@Packaged Software) price change was +14.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.28% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFCI YTD gains are higher at: 531.068 vs. URLOF (169.730).
CFCIURLOFCFCI / URLOF
CapitalizationN/A11.1M-
EBITDAN/A-1.51M-
Gain YTD531.068169.730313%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A46.2M-
Total CashN/A451K-
Total DebtN/A3.53M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFCI vs URLOF: Fundamental Ratings
CFCI
URLOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9581
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1002
SMR RATING
1..100
10092
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1003
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFCI's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for URLOF (88). This means that CFCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than URLOF’s over the last 12 months.

URLOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CFCI (100). This means that URLOF’s stock grew significantly faster than CFCI’s over the last 12 months.

URLOF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CFCI (100). This means that URLOF’s stock grew similarly to CFCI’s over the last 12 months.

CFCI's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as URLOF (35). This means that CFCI’s stock grew similarly to URLOF’s over the last 12 months.

URLOF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CFCI (100). This means that URLOF’s stock grew significantly faster than CFCI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFCIURLOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFCI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
URLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTCM2.750.07
+2.61%
BIT Mining Limited
GDS35.670.12
+0.34%
GDS Holdings Limited
WLFC149.370.33
+0.22%
Willis Lease Finance Corp
SCS15.990.03
+0.19%
Steelcase
TSM231.37-1.10
-0.47%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd

CFCI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFCI and TAOP have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFCI and TAOP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFCI
1D Price
Change %
CFCI100%
N/A
TAOP - CFCI
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.88%
LFMD - CFCI
28%
Poorly correlated
-44.85%
URLOF - CFCI
24%
Poorly correlated
+9.71%
FORA - CFCI
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
IDAI - CFCI
8%
Poorly correlated
+4.04%
More

URLOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that URLOF and CFCI have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that URLOF and CFCI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To URLOF
1D Price
Change %
URLOF100%
+9.71%
CFCI - URLOF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNTMF - URLOF
22%
Poorly correlated
-47.37%
IGGGF - URLOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+13.82%
TEAM - URLOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
TMICF - URLOF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More