CFEIY
Price
$5.24
Change
+$0.05 (+0.96%)
Updated
Oct 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.92B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CIADF
Price
$1.88
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
7.41B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFEIY vs CIADF

Header iconCFEIY vs CIADF Comparison
Open Charts CFEIY vs CIADFBanner chart's image
China Feihe
Price$5.24
Change+$0.05 (+0.96%)
Volume$344
Capitalization4.92B
China Mengniu Dairy
Price$1.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.63K
Capitalization7.41B
CFEIY vs CIADF Comparison Chart in %
CFEIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CIADF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFEIY vs. CIADF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFEIY is a Hold and CIADF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CFEIY: $5.24 vs. CIADF: $1.88)
Brand notoriety: CFEIY and CIADF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFEIY: 68% vs. CIADF: 97%
Market capitalization -- CFEIY: $4.9B vs. CIADF: $7.36B
CFEIY [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $4.9B. CIADF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $7.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $255.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFEIY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCIADF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFEIY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CIADF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFEIY is a better buy in the long-term than CIADF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFEIY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CIADF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFEIY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CIADF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFEIY is a better buy in the short-term than CIADF.

Price Growth

CFEIY (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CIADF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -5.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.72% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIADF($7.41B) has a higher market cap than CFEIY($4.92B). CIADF has higher P/E ratio than CFEIY: CIADF (515.87) vs CFEIY (12.82). CIADF YTD gains are higher at: 26.689 vs. CFEIY (-25.899).
CFEIYCIADFCFEIY / CIADF
Capitalization4.92B7.41B66%
EBITDA4.99BN/A-
Gain YTD-25.89926.689-97%
P/E Ratio12.82515.872%
Revenue19.8BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFEIY vs CIADF: Fundamental Ratings
CFEIY
CIADF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4591
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1854
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
491
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5043

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFEIY's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIADF (40). This means that CFEIY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIADF’s over the last 12 months.

CFEIY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CIADF (100). This means that CFEIY’s stock grew similarly to CIADF’s over the last 12 months.

CFEIY's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIADF (54). This means that CFEIY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIADF’s over the last 12 months.

CIADF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as CFEIY (63). This means that CIADF’s stock grew similarly to CFEIY’s over the last 12 months.

CIADF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFEIY (49). This means that CIADF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFEIY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFEIYCIADF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
25%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFEIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CIADF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GAMPX13.820.02
+0.14%
GS Energy Infrastructure Fd P
FPHAX30.82N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Port
PZVNX13.24N/A
N/A
Pzena International Value Investor
CIMEX27.16-0.03
-0.11%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529E
ACGMX23.16-0.03
-0.13%
Invesco Growth and Income Y

CFEIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFEIY has been loosely correlated with CHFLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFEIY jumps, then CHFLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFEIY
1D Price
Change %
CFEIY100%
N/A
CHFLF - CFEIY
35%
Loosely correlated
+16.30%
ZHYBF - CFEIY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HNFSA - CFEIY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIADF - CFEIY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSRGY - CFEIY
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
More

CIADF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIADF and SHVTF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIADF and SHVTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIADF
1D Price
Change %
CIADF100%
N/A
SHVTF - CIADF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFEIY - CIADF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFF - CIADF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DANOY - CIADF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
CIADY - CIADF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
More