CFFI
Price
$63.00
Change
-$0.85 (-1.33%)
Updated
Aug 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
163.61M
LARK
Price
$24.60
Change
+$0.31 (+1.28%)
Updated
Aug 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
105.44M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFFI vs LARK

Header iconCFFI vs LARK Comparison
Open Charts CFFI vs LARKBanner chart's image
C&F Financial
Price$63.00
Change-$0.85 (-1.33%)
Volume$100
Capitalization163.61M
Landmark Ban
Price$24.60
Change+$0.31 (+1.28%)
Volume$1.72K
Capitalization105.44M
CFFI vs LARK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFFI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LARK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFFI vs. LARK commentary
Aug 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFFI is a Hold and LARK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 02, 2025
Stock price -- (CFFI: $63.85 vs. LARK: $24.51)
Brand notoriety: CFFI and LARK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFFI: 36% vs. LARK: 24%
Market capitalization -- CFFI: $163.61M vs. LARK: $105.44M
CFFI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $163.61M. LARK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $105.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFFI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLARK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CFFI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LARK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LARK is a better buy in the long-term than CFFI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFFI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LARK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFFI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LARK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CFFI and LARK are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CFFI (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.84% price change this week, while LARK (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFFI is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

LARK is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.75% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFFI($164M) has a higher market cap than LARK($105M). LARK has higher P/E ratio than CFFI: LARK (8.64) vs CFFI (7.08). LARK YTD gains are higher at: 3.670 vs. CFFI (-9.162). LARK has less debt than CFFI: LARK (99M) vs CFFI (110M). CFFI has higher revenues than LARK: CFFI (126M) vs LARK (56.5M).
CFFILARKCFFI / LARK
Capitalization164M105M156%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-9.1623.670-250%
P/E Ratio7.088.6482%
Revenue126M56.5M223%
Total Cash16.4MN/A-
Total Debt110M99M111%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFFI vs LARK: Fundamental Ratings
CFFI
LARK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1673
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4140
SMR RATING
1..100
3345
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5858
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7458
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFFI's Valuation (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LARK (37) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CFFI’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.

LARK's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CFFI (41) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to CFFI’s over the last 12 months.

CFFI's SMR Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LARK (45) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CFFI’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.

CFFI's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LARK (58) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CFFI’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.

LARK's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as CFFI (74) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to CFFI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFFILARK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFFI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LARK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZNOG0.23N/A
+2.14%
Zion Oil & Gas, Inc.
CTTOF8.30N/A
N/A
CTT Correios Portugal SA
GLAPY71.00N/A
N/A
Glanbia Plc
HMTC4.50N/A
N/A
Homasote Co.
MONRF55.04N/A
N/A
Moncler S.P.A.

LARK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LARK has been loosely correlated with BVFL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LARK jumps, then BVFL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LARK
1D Price
Change %
LARK100%
-2.47%
BVFL - LARK
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
OVBC - LARK
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.89%
UNB - LARK
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
FUNC - LARK
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
CFFI - LARK
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
More