CFFN
Price
$5.94
Change
+$0.08 (+1.37%)
Updated
Jan 31, 10:36 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
797.05M
82 days until earnings call
SFNC
Price
$22.75
Change
-$0.02 (-0.09%)
Updated
Jan 31, 11:52 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.42B
88 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CFFN vs SFNC

Header iconCFFN vs SFNC Comparison
Open Charts CFFN vs SFNCBanner chart's image
Capitol Federal Financial
Price$5.94
Change+$0.08 (+1.37%)
Volume$150
Capitalization797.05M
Simmons First National
Price$22.75
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
Volume$300
Capitalization2.42B
CFFN vs SFNC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CFFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFFN vs. SFNC commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFFN is a StrongBuy and SFNC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (CFFN: $5.86 vs. SFNC: $22.77)
Brand notoriety: CFFN and SFNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFFN: 84% vs. SFNC: 75%
Market capitalization -- CFFN: $797.05M vs. SFNC: $2.42B
CFFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $797.05M. SFNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFFN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFNC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFNC is a better buy in the long-term than CFFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFFN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFNC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFFN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SFNC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFFN is a better buy in the short-term than SFNC.

Price Growth

CFFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.64% price change this week, while SFNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFFN is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

SFNC is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFNC($2.42B) has a higher market cap than CFFN($797M). SFNC has higher P/E ratio than CFFN: SFNC (13.98) vs CFFN (10.40). SFNC YTD gains are higher at: 2.660 vs. CFFN (-0.846). SFNC has more cash in the bank: 345M vs. CFFN (32.6M). SFNC has less debt than CFFN: SFNC (1.34B) vs CFFN (2.37B). SFNC has higher revenues than CFFN: SFNC (782M) vs CFFN (-41.29M).
CFFNSFNCCFFN / SFNC
Capitalization797M2.42B33%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.8462.660-32%
P/E Ratio10.4013.9874%
Revenue-41.29M782M-5%
Total Cash32.6M345M9%
Total Debt2.37B1.34B177%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFFN vs SFNC: Fundamental Ratings
CFFN
SFNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
712
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10092
SMR RATING
1..100
2612
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
893
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFFN's Valuation (52) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFNC (94) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFFN’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CFFN (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's SMR Rating (12) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CFFN (26) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CFFN (58) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CFFN (89) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew significantly faster than CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFFNSFNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CFFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JDEAX43.960.08
+0.18%
JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Equity A
FSCEX15.65N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap C
NBRFX13.91N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Tr
SCUIX32.04N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders US Small Cap Opps I
PIEFX15.41N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Emerging Markets Eq IS

CFFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFFN has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFFN jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFFN
1D Price
Change %
CFFN100%
N/A
UBSI - CFFN
81%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
NWBI - CFFN
80%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
SFNC - CFFN
79%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
GSBC - CFFN
79%
Closely correlated
-1.67%
EBC - CFFN
79%
Closely correlated
+1.65%
More

SFNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFNC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFNC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFNC
1D Price
Change %
SFNC100%
+0.80%
UBSI - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
SBCF - SFNC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
NWBI - SFNC
89%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
WSFS - SFNC
89%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
UCB - SFNC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
More