CFFN
Price
$6.33
Change
-$0.10 (-1.56%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
797.05M
15 days until earnings call
TRMK
Price
$38.24
Change
-$0.35 (-0.91%)
Updated
Jul 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.72B
14 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFFN vs TRMK

Header iconCFFN vs TRMK Comparison
Open Charts CFFN vs TRMKBanner chart's image
Capitol Federal Financial
Price$6.33
Change-$0.10 (-1.56%)
Volume$785.24K
Capitalization797.05M
Trustmark
Price$38.24
Change-$0.35 (-0.91%)
Volume$237.92K
Capitalization1.72B
CFFN vs TRMK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRMK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFFN vs. TRMK commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFFN is a Buy and TRMK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CFFN: $6.33 vs. TRMK: $38.24)
Brand notoriety: CFFN and TRMK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFFN: 76% vs. TRMK: 80%
Market capitalization -- CFFN: $797.05M vs. TRMK: $1.72B
CFFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $797.05M. TRMK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFFN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRMK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRMK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRMK is a better buy in the long-term than CFFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFFN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRMK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFFN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TRMK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFFN is a better buy in the short-term than TRMK.

Price Growth

CFFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.77% price change this week, while TRMK (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFFN is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

TRMK is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.99% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRMK($1.72B) has a higher market cap than CFFN($797M). CFFN (10.40) and TRMK (10.19) have similar P/E ratio . CFFN YTD gains are higher at: 10.236 vs. TRMK (9.588). TRMK has less debt than CFFN: TRMK (631M) vs CFFN (2.37B). TRMK has higher revenues than CFFN: TRMK (658M) vs CFFN (-41.29M).
CFFNTRMKCFFN / TRMK
Capitalization797M1.72B46%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.2369.588107%
P/E Ratio10.4010.19102%
Revenue-41.29M658M-6%
Total Cash32.6MN/A-
Total Debt2.37B631M376%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFFN vs TRMK: Fundamental Ratings
CFFN
TRMK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1518
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10043
SMR RATING
1..100
2512
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
874
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFFN's Valuation (37) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRMK (82) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CFFN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRMK’s over the last 12 months.

TRMK's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFFN (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that TRMK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

TRMK's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFFN (25) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that TRMK’s stock grew similarly to CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

TRMK's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFFN (44) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that TRMK’s stock grew similarly to CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

TRMK's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CFFN (87) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that TRMK’s stock grew significantly faster than CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFFNTRMK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRMK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSLEX43.30N/A
N/A
Fidelity Environment & Alternative Engy
ALABX12.67N/A
N/A
ALPS/Smith Balanced Opportunity A
DSMLX65.25N/A
N/A
Touchstone Large Company Growth Instl
FZABX30.07N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
HFQRX6.85-0.05
-0.72%
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N

CFFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFFN has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFFN jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFFN
1D Price
Change %
CFFN100%
-1.56%
UBSI - CFFN
80%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
PGC - CFFN
80%
Closely correlated
-1.38%
PPBI - CFFN
80%
Closely correlated
-1.47%
BHB - CFFN
80%
Closely correlated
-1.74%
TRMK - CFFN
80%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
More

TRMK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRMK has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRMK jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRMK
1D Price
Change %
TRMK100%
-0.91%
UBSI - TRMK
91%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
HWC - TRMK
91%
Closely correlated
-1.83%
SBCF - TRMK
91%
Closely correlated
-1.76%
HOPE - TRMK
91%
Closely correlated
-1.60%
ABCB - TRMK
90%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
More