CFFN
Price
$6.08
Change
-$0.06 (-0.98%)
Updated
Nov 19, 01:35 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
796.15M
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TRMK
Price
$37.45
Change
+$0.15 (+0.40%)
Updated
Nov 19, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.24B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFFN vs TRMK

Header iconCFFN vs TRMK Comparison
Open Charts CFFN vs TRMKBanner chart's image
Capitol Federal Financial
Price$6.08
Change-$0.06 (-0.98%)
Volume$620
Capitalization796.15M
Trustmark
Price$37.45
Change+$0.15 (+0.40%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.24B
CFFN vs TRMK Comparison Chart in %
CFFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRMK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFFN vs. TRMK commentary
Nov 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFFN is a Hold and TRMK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CFFN: $6.14 vs. TRMK: $37.28)
Brand notoriety: CFFN and TRMK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFFN: 79% vs. TRMK: 71%
Market capitalization -- CFFN: $796.15M vs. TRMK: $2.24B
CFFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $796.15M. TRMK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFFN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRMK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFFN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRMK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRMK is a better buy in the long-term than CFFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFFN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRMK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFFN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TRMK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFFN is a better buy in the short-term than TRMK.

Price Growth

CFFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.53% price change this week, while TRMK (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFFN is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

TRMK is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.14% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRMK($2.24B) has a higher market cap than CFFN($796M). CFFN has higher P/E ratio than TRMK: CFFN (11.70) vs TRMK (10.19). CFFN YTD gains are higher at: 10.050 vs. TRMK (7.474). TRMK has less debt than CFFN: TRMK (782M) vs CFFN (2.07B). TRMK has higher revenues than CFFN: TRMK (673M) vs CFFN (189M).
CFFNTRMKCFFN / TRMK
Capitalization796M2.24B36%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.0507.474134%
P/E Ratio11.7010.19115%
Revenue189M673M28%
Total Cash24.4MN/A-
Total Debt2.07B782M265%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFFN vs TRMK: Fundamental Ratings
CFFN
TRMK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
206
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10045
SMR RATING
1..100
3714
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5458
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TRMK's Valuation (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFFN (64) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that TRMK’s stock grew similarly to CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

TRMK's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFFN (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that TRMK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

TRMK's SMR Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CFFN (37) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that TRMK’s stock grew similarly to CFFN’s over the last 12 months.

CFFN's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as TRMK (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CFFN’s stock grew similarly to TRMK’s over the last 12 months.

CFFN's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as TRMK (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CFFN’s stock grew similarly to TRMK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFFNTRMK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRMK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGECX23.67N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Global Emerging Mkts - C
BEMIX11.86-0.06
-0.50%
Brandes Emerging Markets Value I
WSACX31.81-0.26
-0.81%
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
MRICX24.30-0.32
-1.30%
MFS Research International C
AIVEX19.91-0.27
-1.34%
American Funds International Vntg F-1

CFFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFFN has been closely correlated with NBTB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFFN jumps, then NBTB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFFN
1D Price
Change %
CFFN100%
+0.90%
NBTB - CFFN
82%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
STBA - CFFN
82%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
FBNC - CFFN
81%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
FCF - CFFN
81%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
TRMK - CFFN
81%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
More

TRMK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRMK has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRMK jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRMK
1D Price
Change %
TRMK100%
+1.47%
UBSI - TRMK
88%
Closely correlated
+1.52%
SBCF - TRMK
88%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
UCB - TRMK
88%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
FULT - TRMK
88%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
HWC - TRMK
88%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
More