CFG
Price
$51.15
Change
+$0.72 (+1.43%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.97B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UBAB
Price
$53.95
Change
-$0.05 (-0.09%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
174.53M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFG vs UBAB

Header iconCFG vs UBAB Comparison
Open Charts CFG vs UBABBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Group
Price$51.15
Change+$0.72 (+1.43%)
Volume$25.4K
Capitalization21.97B
United Bancorporation of Alabama
Price$53.95
Change-$0.05 (-0.09%)
Volume$6.55K
Capitalization174.53M
CFG vs UBAB Comparison Chart in %
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UBAB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFG vs. UBAB commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a Hold and UBAB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CFG: $50.43 vs. UBAB: $53.95)
Brand notoriety: CFG and UBAB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 100% vs. UBAB: 374%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $21.97B vs. UBAB: $174.59M
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $21.97B. UBAB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $174.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUBAB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UBAB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBAB is a better buy in the long-term than CFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBAB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UBAB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UBAB is a better buy in the short-term than CFG.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.46% price change this week, while UBAB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.96% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFG($22B) has a higher market cap than UBAB($175M). CFG has higher P/E ratio than UBAB: CFG (14.33) vs UBAB (8.86). CFG YTD gains are higher at: 19.662 vs. UBAB (-4.067). CFG has more cash in the bank: 8.55B vs. UBAB (31.4M). UBAB has less debt than CFG: UBAB (30.6M) vs CFG (12.8B). CFG has higher revenues than UBAB: CFG (7.85B) vs UBAB (76.5M).
CFGUBABCFG / UBAB
Capitalization22B175M12,571%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.662-4.067-483%
P/E Ratio14.338.86162%
Revenue7.85B76.5M10,263%
Total Cash8.55B31.4M27,223%
Total Debt12.8B30.6M41,830%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs UBAB: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
UBAB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7788
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
449
SMR RATING
1..100
744
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7119
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UBAB's Valuation (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CFG (75) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that UBAB’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

UBAB's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFG (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that UBAB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's SMR Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBAB (44) in the null industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBAB’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UBAB (57) in the null industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to UBAB’s over the last 12 months.

UBAB's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFG (71) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that UBAB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGUBAB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UBAB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICWIX6.920.03
+0.44%
Integrity Mid-North American Resources I
CMNWX88.18N/A
N/A
Principal Capital Appreciation A
BAGAX13.82N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory Growth Equity Adv
CVMAX22.59N/A
N/A
Calvert Emerging Markets Equity A
BWNYX30.85-0.14
-0.45%
Bullfinch Greater Western New York