Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFIPX vs RWIBX
CFIPX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts CFIPX vs RWIBX
CFIPX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFIPX vs. RWIBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFIPX is a Hold and RWIBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. CFIPX (680M). RWIBX pays higher dividends than CFIPX: RWIBX (0.70) vs CFIPX (0.44). CFIPX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: CFIPX (36 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). RWIBX (1.51) is less costly to investors than CFIPX (1.22). RWIBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CFIPX (31.00). RWIBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFIPX: RWIBX (250) vs CFIPX (1000). CFIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.01 vs. RWIBX (12.64). CFIPX return over 5 years is better than : 56.07 vs. RWIBX (29.73).
| CFIPX | RWIBX | CFIPX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.51 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.51 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.428 | 16.388 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 680M | 158B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.70 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.01 | 12.64 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.25 | 48.82 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.07 | 29.73 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.73 | 88.46 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement