Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFIPX vs RWIBX
CFIPX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts CFIPX vs RWIBX
CFIPX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFIPX vs. RWIBX commentary
Jun 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFIPX is a Hold and RWIBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. CFIPX (624M). RWIBX pays higher dividends than CFIPX: RWIBX (0.74) vs CFIPX (0.46). CFIPX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: CFIPX (35 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). RWIBX (1.51) is less costly to investors than CFIPX (1.22). RWIBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CFIPX (31.00). RWIBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFIPX: RWIBX (250) vs CFIPX (1000). CFIPX (17.19) and RWIBX (16.88) have marching annual gain over last year. CFIPX return over 5 years is better than : 49.21 vs. RWIBX (27.86).
| CFIPX | RWIBX | CFIPX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.51 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.51 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.082 | 13.252 | 61% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 624M | 160B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.74 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.19 | 16.88 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.97 | 45.41 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.21 | 27.86 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.11 | 95.01 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers