Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs EASCX
CFMOX vs EASCX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs EASCX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.79M
Eaton Vance SC Municipal Income A
Price$8.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.47M
CFMOX vs EASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. EASCX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and EASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 235M vs. EASCX (199M). EASCX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: EASCX (3.48) vs CFMOX (2.54). CFMOX was incepted earlier than EASCX: CFMOX (31 years) vs EASCX (32 years). EASCX (0.71) and CFMOX (0.70) have similar cost to investors . EASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and EASCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.50 vs. EASCX (1.99). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : 2.72 vs. EASCX (0.58).
| CFMOX | EASCX | CFMOX / EASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.71 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.71 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.930 | 2.691 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 235M | 199M | 118% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 3.48 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.50 | 1.99 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.73 | 10.04 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.72 | 0.58 | 469% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.40 | 5.64 | 309% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers