Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs ECNCX
CFMOX vs ECNCX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs ECNCX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.26M
Eaton Vance NC Municipal Income C
Price$9.03
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets239.41M
CFMOX vs ECNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. ECNCX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and ECNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECNCX (239M) and CFMOX (233M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CFMOX pays higher dividends than ECNCX: CFMOX (2.53) vs ECNCX (2.29). CFMOX was incepted earlier than ECNCX: CFMOX (31 years) vs ECNCX (19 years). ECNCX (1.45) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). ECNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and ECNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.71 vs. ECNCX (1.33). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : 2.45 vs. ECNCX (-1.66).
| CFMOX | ECNCX | CFMOX / ECNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.45 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.45 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.097 | 1.943 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 233M | 239M | 97% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 2.29 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.71 | 1.33 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.06 | 9.07 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.45 | -1.66 | -147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.40 | -0.12 | -13,439% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers