Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs ECSCX
CFMOX vs ECSCX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs ECSCX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.79M
Eaton Vance SC Municipal Income C
Price$9.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.47M
CFMOX vs ECSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. ECSCX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and ECSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 235M vs. ECSCX (199M). ECSCX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: ECSCX (2.74) vs CFMOX (2.54). CFMOX was incepted earlier than ECSCX: CFMOX (31 years) vs ECSCX (20 years). ECSCX (1.46) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). ECSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and ECSCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.50 vs. ECSCX (1.36). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : 2.72 vs. ECSCX (-2.17).
| CFMOX | ECSCX | CFMOX / ECSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.46 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.46 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.930 | 2.112 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 235M | 199M | 118% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 2.74 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.50 | 1.36 | 257% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.73 | 7.86 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.72 | -2.17 | -125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.40 | 2.05 | 849% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement