Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs ECSCX
CFMOX vs ECSCX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs ECSCX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.29
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.76M
Eaton Vance SC Municipal Income C
Price$8.78
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets189.49M
CFMOX vs ECSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. ECSCX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and ECSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. ECSCX (189M). ECSCX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: ECSCX (2.88) vs CFMOX (2.53). CFMOX was incepted earlier than ECSCX: CFMOX (30 years) vs ECSCX (20 years). ECSCX (1.46) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). ECSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and ECSCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.05 vs. ECSCX (-2.18). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : -1.09 vs. ECSCX (-6.24).
| CFMOX | ECSCX | CFMOX / ECSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.46 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.46 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.713 | -2.142 | -33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 189M | 121% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 2.88 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.05 | -2.18 | -48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.32 | 0.70 | 620% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.09 | -6.24 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.06 | -1.20 | -1,174% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers