Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs EISCX
CFMOX vs EISCX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs EISCX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.64
Change-$0.03 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets230.34M
Eaton Vance SC Municipal Income I
Price$8.52
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets191.56M
CFMOX vs EISCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. EISCX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and EISCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 230M vs. EISCX (192M). EISCX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: EISCX (3.83) vs CFMOX (2.54). CFMOX was incepted earlier than EISCX: CFMOX (31 years) vs EISCX (18 years). CFMOX (0.70) is less costly to investors than EISCX (0.51). EISCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than EISCX: CFMOX (1000) vs EISCX (1000000). CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.13 vs. EISCX (0.85). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : 1.88 vs. EISCX (0.64).
| CFMOX | EISCX | CFMOX / EISCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.51 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.51 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.977 | 1.573 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 230M | 192M | 120% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 3.83 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.13 | 0.85 | 250% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.57 | 9.80 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.88 | 0.64 | 295% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.69 | 6.15 | 271% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement