Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs EISCX
CFMOX vs EISCX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs EISCX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.21
Change+$0.04 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.56M
Eaton Vance SC Municipal Income I
Price$8.32
Change+$0.02 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets180.02M
CFMOX vs EISCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. EISCX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and EISCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. EISCX (180M). EISCX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: EISCX (3.86) vs CFMOX (2.48). CFMOX was incepted earlier than EISCX: CFMOX (30 years) vs EISCX (17 years). CFMOX (0.70) is less costly to investors than EISCX (0.51). EISCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than EISCX: CFMOX (1000) vs EISCX (1000000). CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.03 vs. EISCX (-0.50). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : -1.42 vs. EISCX (-2.15).
| CFMOX | EISCX | CFMOX / EISCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.51 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.51 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.452 | -2.071 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 180M | 127% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 3.86 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.03 | -0.50 | -203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.98 | 4.76 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.42 | -2.15 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.26 | 2.45 | 541% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers