Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs ETMOX
CFMOX vs ETMOX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs ETMOX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.79M
Eaton Vance MO Municipal Income A
Price$8.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.24M
CFMOX vs ETMOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. ETMOX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and ETMOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 235M vs. ETMOX (92.2M). ETMOX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: ETMOX (3.40) vs CFMOX (2.54). CFMOX was incepted earlier than ETMOX: CFMOX (31 years) vs ETMOX (32 years). ETMOX (0.71) and CFMOX (0.70) have similar cost to investors . ETMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and ETMOX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.50 vs. ETMOX (3.00). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : 2.72 vs. ETMOX (-0.34).
| CFMOX | ETMOX | CFMOX / ETMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.71 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.71 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.930 | 3.712 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 235M | 92.2M | 255% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 3.40 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.50 | 3.00 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.73 | 11.18 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.72 | -0.34 | -800% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.40 | 5.01 | 347% |