Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs ETMOX
CFMOX vs ETMOX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs ETMOX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.26M
Eaton Vance MO Municipal Income A
Price$8.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.32M
CFMOX vs ETMOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. ETMOX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and ETMOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 233M vs. ETMOX (90.3M). ETMOX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: ETMOX (3.16) vs CFMOX (2.53). CFMOX was incepted earlier than ETMOX: CFMOX (31 years) vs ETMOX (32 years). ETMOX (0.71) and CFMOX (0.70) have similar cost to investors . ETMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and ETMOX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.71 vs. ETMOX (2.54). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : 2.45 vs. ETMOX (0.16).
| CFMOX | ETMOX | CFMOX / ETMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.71 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.71 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.097 | 2.954 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 233M | 90.3M | 258% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 3.16 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.71 | 2.54 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.06 | 12.33 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.45 | 0.16 | 1,509% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.40 | 4.46 | 368% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement