Ad is loading...
CFMOX vs ETMOX
CFMOX vs ETMOX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs ETMOX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.12
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.1M
Eaton Vance MO Municipal Income A
Price$8.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.95M
CFMOX vs ETMOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. ETMOX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and ETMOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. ETMOX (83M). ETMOX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: ETMOX (3.52) vs CFMOX (2.41). CFMOX was incepted earlier than ETMOX: CFMOX (30 years) vs ETMOX (31 years). ETMOX (0.71) and CFMOX (0.70) have similar cost to investors . ETMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and ETMOX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ETMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.12 vs. CFMOX (0.85). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : 0.14 vs. ETMOX (-1.65).
| CFMOX | ETMOX | CFMOX / ETMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.71 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.71 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.328 | -1.841 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 83M | 276% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.41 | 3.52 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.85 | 1.12 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.57 | 2.36 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.14 | -1.65 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.52 | -0.82 | -1,404% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers