Ad is loading...
CFMOX vs UTACX
CFMOX vs UTACX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs UTACX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.14
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.25M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.39
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.52M
CFMOX vs UTACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. UTACX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and UTACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. UTACX (199M). UTACX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: UTACX (2.66) vs CFMOX (2.41). CFMOX was incepted earlier than UTACX: CFMOX (30 years) vs UTACX (29 years). UTACX (1.54) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). UTACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and UTACX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.91 vs. UTACX (0.52). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : 0.31 vs. UTACX (-2.68).
| CFMOX | UTACX | CFMOX / UTACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.10 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.54 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.165 | -1.227 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 199M | 115% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.41 | 2.66 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.91 | 0.52 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.75 | 2.12 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.31 | -2.68 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.71 | 4.50 | 260% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers