Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs UTACX
CFMOX vs UTACX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs UTACX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.62
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets230.13M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.61
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets189.14M
CFMOX vs UTACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. UTACX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and UTACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 230M vs. UTACX (189M). UTACX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: UTACX (3.24) vs CFMOX (2.54). CFMOX was incepted earlier than UTACX: CFMOX (31 years) vs UTACX (29 years). UTACX (1.54) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). UTACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and UTACX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. UTACX (1.89) and CFMOX (1.86) have marching annual gain over last year. CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : 1.45 vs. UTACX (-2.34).
| CFMOX | UTACX | CFMOX / UTACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.10 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.54 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.591 | 2.490 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 230M | 189M | 122% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 3.24 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.86 | 1.89 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.97 | 7.31 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.45 | -2.34 | -62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.25 | 8.85 | 184% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers