Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs UTACX
CFMOX vs UTACX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs UTACX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.14
Change+$0.04 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.67M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.39
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets197.66M
CFMOX vs UTACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. UTACX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and UTACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 230M vs. UTACX (198M). UTACX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: UTACX (2.81) vs CFMOX (2.45). CFMOX was incepted earlier than UTACX: CFMOX (30 years) vs UTACX (29 years). UTACX (1.54) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). UTACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and UTACX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.55 vs. UTACX (1.08). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : -1.55 vs. UTACX (-4.81).
| CFMOX | UTACX | CFMOX / UTACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.10 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.54 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.833 | -0.966 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 230M | 198M | 116% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 2.81 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.55 | 1.08 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.33 | 2.70 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.55 | -4.81 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.54 | 5.28 | 238% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers