Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs UTACX
CFMOX vs UTACX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs UTACX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.29
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.76M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.69M
CFMOX vs UTACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. UTACX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and UTACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. UTACX (186M). UTACX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: UTACX (3.23) vs CFMOX (2.53). CFMOX was incepted earlier than UTACX: CFMOX (30 years) vs UTACX (29 years). UTACX (1.54) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). UTACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX (1000) and UTACX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.05 vs. UTACX (0.78). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : -1.09 vs. UTACX (-4.95).
| CFMOX | UTACX | CFMOX / UTACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.10 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.54 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.713 | 0.493 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 186M | 123% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 3.23 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.05 | 0.78 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.32 | 2.01 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.09 | -4.95 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.06 | 6.62 | 212% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement