Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs UTACX
CFMOX vs UTACX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs UTACX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.2M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.68
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets191.79M
CFMOX vs UTACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. UTACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and UTACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 234M vs. UTACX (192M). UTACX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: UTACX (3.21) vs CFMOX (2.53). CFMOX was incepted earlier than UTACX: CFMOX (31 years) vs UTACX (29 years). UTACX (1.54) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). UTACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than UTACX: CFMOX (1000) vs UTACX (2500). UTACX (3.19) and CFMOX (3.04) have marching annual gain over last year. CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : 2.89 vs. UTACX (-0.98).
| CFMOX | UTACX | CFMOX / UTACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.10 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.54 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.539 | 3.524 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 234M | 192M | 122% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 3.21 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.04 | 3.19 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.48 | 9.88 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.89 | -0.98 | -295% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.90 | 9.42 | 179% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers