Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs UTACX
CFMOX vs UTACX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs UTACX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.79M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets194.43M
CFMOX vs UTACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. UTACX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and UTACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 235M vs. UTACX (194M). UTACX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: UTACX (3.20) vs CFMOX (2.54). CFMOX was incepted earlier than UTACX: CFMOX (31 years) vs UTACX (30 years). UTACX (1.54) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). UTACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than UTACX: CFMOX (1000) vs UTACX (2500). CFMOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.50 vs. UTACX (3.31). CFMOX return over 5 years is better than : 2.72 vs. UTACX (-1.54).
| CFMOX | UTACX | CFMOX / UTACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.10 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.54 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.930 | 3.713 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 235M | 194M | 121% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 3.20 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.50 | 3.31 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.73 | 8.23 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.72 | -1.54 | -176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.40 | 9.62 | 181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement