Ad is loading...
CFMOX vs UTAYX
CFMOX vs UTAYX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs UTAYX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.14
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.25M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.42
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.52M
CFMOX vs UTAYX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. UTAYX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and UTAYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. UTAYX (199M). UTAYX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: UTAYX (3.35) vs CFMOX (2.41). CFMOX was incepted earlier than UTAYX: CFMOX (30 years) vs UTAYX (29 years). UTAYX (0.75) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). UTAYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). UTAYX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFMOX: UTAYX (0) vs CFMOX (1000). UTAYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.22 vs. CFMOX (0.91). UTAYX return over 5 years is better than : 2.04 vs. CFMOX (0.31).
| CFMOX | UTAYX | CFMOX / UTAYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.55 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.75 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.165 | -0.986 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 199M | 115% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.41 | 3.35 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.91 | 1.22 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.75 | 4.93 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.31 | 2.04 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.71 | 14.23 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers