Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs UTAYX
CFMOX vs UTAYX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs UTAYX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.70
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.47M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.69
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets190.82M
CFMOX vs UTAYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. UTAYX commentary
Oct 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and UTAYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 233M vs. UTAYX (191M). UTAYX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: UTAYX (3.74) vs CFMOX (2.53). CFMOX was incepted earlier than UTAYX: CFMOX (31 years) vs UTAYX (29 years). UTAYX (0.75) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). UTAYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). CFMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than UTAYX: CFMOX (1000) vs UTAYX (1000000). UTAYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.53 vs. CFMOX (2.76). UTAYX return over 5 years is better than : 3.36 vs. CFMOX (2.56).
| CFMOX | UTAYX | CFMOX / UTAYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.55 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.75 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.207 | 3.833 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 233M | 191M | 122% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 3.74 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.76 | 3.53 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.18 | 12.49 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.56 | 3.36 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.53 | 19.67 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement