Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs UTAYX
CFMOX vs UTAYX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs UTAYX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.29
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.76M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.47
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.69M
CFMOX vs UTAYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. UTAYX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and UTAYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. UTAYX (186M). UTAYX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: UTAYX (3.78) vs CFMOX (2.53). CFMOX was incepted earlier than UTAYX: CFMOX (30 years) vs UTAYX (29 years). UTAYX (0.75) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). UTAYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). UTAYX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFMOX: UTAYX (0) vs CFMOX (1000). UTAYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.23 vs. CFMOX (1.05). UTAYX return over 5 years is better than : -0.60 vs. CFMOX (-1.09).
| CFMOX | UTAYX | CFMOX / UTAYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.55 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.75 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.713 | 0.812 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 186M | 123% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 3.78 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.05 | 1.23 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.32 | 4.53 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.09 | -0.60 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.06 | 16.64 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement