Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFMOX vs UTAYX
CFMOX vs UTAYX Comparison
Open Charts CFMOX vs UTAYX
Commerce MO Tax-Free Int Bd
Price$18.62
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets230.13M
NYLI MacKay Utah Muni
Price$9.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets189.14M
CFMOX vs UTAYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFMOX vs. UTAYX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFMOX is a Hold and UTAYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFMOX has more cash in the bank: 230M vs. UTAYX (189M). UTAYX pays higher dividends than CFMOX: UTAYX (3.78) vs CFMOX (2.54). CFMOX was incepted earlier than UTAYX: CFMOX (31 years) vs UTAYX (29 years). UTAYX (0.75) is less costly to investors than CFMOX (0.70). UTAYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CFMOX (29.00). UTAYX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFMOX: UTAYX (0) vs CFMOX (1000). UTAYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.45 vs. CFMOX (1.86). UTAYX return over 5 years is better than : 2.20 vs. CFMOX (1.45).
| CFMOX | UTAYX | CFMOX / UTAYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.55 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.75 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.591 | 2.965 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 230M | 189M | 122% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 3.78 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.86 | 2.45 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.97 | 10.13 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.45 | 2.20 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.25 | 19.24 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement