CFOO
Price
$0.77
Change
-$1.73 (-69.20%)
Updated
Mar 12 closing price
Capitalization
50.63M
CLBEY
Price
$4.63
Change
-$0.05 (-1.07%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.45B
Ad is loading...

CFOO vs CLBEY

Header iconCFOO vs CLBEY Comparison
Open Charts CFOO vs CLBEYBanner chart's image
China Foods Holdings
Price$0.77
Change-$1.73 (-69.20%)
Volume$2.71K
Capitalization50.63M
Calbee
Price$4.63
Change-$0.05 (-1.07%)
Volume$600
Capitalization2.45B
CFOO vs CLBEY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLBEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFOO vs. CLBEY commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFOO is a Hold and CLBEY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CFOO: $0.77 vs. CLBEY: $4.63)
Brand notoriety: CFOO and CLBEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFOO: 100% vs. CLBEY: 23%
Market capitalization -- CFOO: $50.63M vs. CLBEY: $2.45B
CFOO [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $50.63M. CLBEY’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $2.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFOO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLBEY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFOO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLBEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLBEY is a better buy in the long-term than CFOO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLBEY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CLBEY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CFOO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CLBEY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -6.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.73% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBEY($2.45B) has a higher market cap than CFOO($50.6M). CFOO YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. CLBEY (-8.957). CLBEY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 34.8B vs. CFOO (-365.58K). CLBEY has more cash in the bank: 32.2B vs. CFOO (309K). CFOO has less debt than CLBEY: CFOO (7.12K) vs CLBEY (1.85B). CLBEY has higher revenues than CFOO: CLBEY (279B) vs CFOO (298K).
CFOOCLBEYCFOO / CLBEY
Capitalization50.6M2.45B2%
EBITDA-365.58K34.8B-0%
Gain YTD0.000-8.957-
P/E RatioN/A23.64-
Revenue298K279B0%
Total Cash309K32.2B0%
Total Debt7.12K1.85B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLBEY: Fundamental Ratings
CLBEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
19
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFOOCLBEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLBEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EIDO18.500.14
+0.76%
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF
DGRW82.400.46
+0.56%
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Gr ETF
EMXF37.430.15
+0.41%
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
GOVI26.990.03
+0.11%
Invesco Equal Weight 0-30 Years Trs ETF
UST40.56N/A
-0.01%
ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury

CFOO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFOO and BABB have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFOO and BABB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFOO
1D Price
Change %
CFOO100%
N/A
BABB - CFOO
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
CLBEY - CFOO
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
CFEIY - CFOO
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNEVY - CFOO
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFF - CFOO
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLBEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLBEY and MEJHY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLBEY and MEJHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLBEY
1D Price
Change %
CLBEY100%
-0.96%
MEJHY - CLBEY
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
DANOY - CLBEY
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
FNEVY - CLBEY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFY - CLBEY
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.11%
CFOO - CLBEY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More