CFOO
Price
$0.77
Change
-$1.73 (-69.20%)
Updated
Mar 12 closing price
CLBEY
Price
$5.18
Change
-$0.28 (-5.13%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

CFOO vs CLBEY

Header iconCFOO vs CLBEY Comparison
Open Charts CFOO vs CLBEYBanner chart's image
China Foods Holdings
Price$0.77
Change-$1.73 (-69.20%)
Volume$2.71K
CapitalizationN/A
Calbee
Price$5.18
Change-$0.28 (-5.13%)
Volume$760
CapitalizationN/A
CFOO vs CLBEY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLBEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFOO vs. CLBEY commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFOO is a Hold and CLBEY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CFOO: $0.77 vs. CLBEY: $5.18)
Brand notoriety: CFOO and CLBEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFOO: 100% vs. CLBEY: 20%
Market capitalization -- CFOO: $50.63M vs. CLBEY: $2.45B
CFOO [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $50.63M. CLBEY’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $2.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFOO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLBEY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFOO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLBEY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLBEY is a better buy in the long-term than CFOO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLBEY’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CLBEY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CFOO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CLBEY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -5.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-2.41% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBEY($2.45B) has a higher market cap than CFOO($50.6M). CLBEY YTD gains are higher at: 9.133 vs. CFOO (-69.200). CLBEY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 34.8B vs. CFOO (-365.58K). CLBEY has more cash in the bank: 32.2B vs. CFOO (309K). CFOO has less debt than CLBEY: CFOO (7.12K) vs CLBEY (1.85B). CLBEY has higher revenues than CFOO: CLBEY (279B) vs CFOO (298K).
CFOOCLBEYCFOO / CLBEY
Capitalization50.6M2.45B2%
EBITDA-365.58K34.8B-0%
Gain YTD-69.2009.133-758%
P/E RatioN/A23.64-
Revenue298K279B0%
Total Cash309K32.2B0%
Total Debt7.12K1.85B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLBEY: Fundamental Ratings
CLBEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
19
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFOOCLBEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLBEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHAU15.180.35
+2.36%
Direxion Dly CSI 300 CHN A Shr Bl 2X ETF
SLVO77.70-0.33
-0.42%
UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered CallETN
ICOP26.69-0.26
-0.96%
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
AXS.X7.255346-0.336439
-4.43%
Axie Infinity cryptocurrency
AUDIO.X0.187067-0.010576
-5.35%
Audius cryptocurrency

CFOO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFOO and BABB have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFOO and BABB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFOO
1D Price
Change %
CFOO100%
N/A
BABB - CFOO
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.76%
CLBEY - CFOO
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
BSFC - CFOO
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
CFEIY - CFOO
0%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
FNEVY - CFOO
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLBEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLBEY and MEJHY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLBEY and MEJHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLBEY
1D Price
Change %
CLBEY100%
+1.11%
MEJHY - CLBEY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DANOY - CLBEY
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
FNEVY - CLBEY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFY - CLBEY
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
CFOO - CLBEY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More