Ad is loading...
CFOO
Price
$0.77
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 12 closing price
CLBEY
Price
$4.50
Change
-$0.34 (-7.02%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

CFOO vs CLBEY

Header iconCFOO vs CLBEY Comparison
Open Charts CFOO vs CLBEYBanner chart's image
China Foods Holdings
Price$0.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.71K
CapitalizationN/A
Calbee
Price$4.50
Change-$0.34 (-7.02%)
Volume$964
CapitalizationN/A
CFOO vs CLBEY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFOO vs. CLBEY commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFOO is a Hold and CLBEY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CFOO: $0.77 vs. CLBEY: $4.50)
Brand notoriety: CFOO and CLBEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFOO: 100% vs. CLBEY: 33%
Market capitalization -- CFOO: $50.63M vs. CLBEY: $2.45B
CFOO [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $50.63M. CLBEY’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $2.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFOO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLBEY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CFOO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLBEY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLBEY is a better buy in the long-term than CFOO.

Price Growth

CFOO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CLBEY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -14.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.31%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.25% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBEY($2.45B) has a higher market cap than CFOO($50.6M). CLBEY YTD gains are higher at: -10.055 vs. CFOO (-69.200). CLBEY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 34.8B vs. CFOO (-365.58K). CLBEY has more cash in the bank: 32.2B vs. CFOO (309K). CFOO has less debt than CLBEY: CFOO (7.12K) vs CLBEY (1.85B). CLBEY has higher revenues than CFOO: CLBEY (279B) vs CFOO (298K).
CFOOCLBEYCFOO / CLBEY
Capitalization50.6M2.45B2%
EBITDA-365.58K34.8B-0%
Gain YTD-69.200-10.055688%
P/E RatioN/A23.64-
Revenue298K279B0%
Total Cash309K32.2B0%
Total Debt7.12K1.85B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLBEY: Fundamental Ratings
CLBEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
63
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
82
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VMVLX256.95-1.02
-0.40%
Vanguard Mega Cap Value Index Instl
MSVIX13.75-0.20
-1.43%
Mesirow Small Company Institutional
GCCLX19.62-0.40
-2.00%
GMO Climate Change I
ACFSX67.81-1.48
-2.14%
American Century Focused Dynamic Gr I
EIFGX29.23-0.70
-2.34%
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opps I

CFOO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFOO and BABB have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFOO and BABB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFOO
1D Price
Change %
CFOO100%
N/A
BABB - CFOO
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.75%
CLBEY - CFOO
3%
Poorly correlated
-7.02%
BSFC - CFOO
0%
Poorly correlated
-10.36%
CFEIY - CFOO
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNEVY - CFOO
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLBEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLBEY and MEJHY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLBEY and MEJHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLBEY
1D Price
Change %
CLBEY100%
-7.02%
MEJHY - CLBEY
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
DANOY - CLBEY
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
FNEVY - CLBEY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFY - CLBEY
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
CFOO - CLBEY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More