CFOO
Price
$0.66
Change
-$0.09 (-12.00%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
50.63M
FNEVY
Price
$4.53
Change
+$0.28 (+6.59%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.19B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFOO vs FNEVY

Header iconCFOO vs FNEVY Comparison
Open Charts CFOO vs FNEVYBanner chart's image
China Foods Holdings
Price$0.66
Change-$0.09 (-12.00%)
Volume$478
Capitalization50.63M
Fraser & Neave
Price$4.53
Change+$0.28 (+6.59%)
Volume$419
Capitalization1.19B
CFOO vs FNEVY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFOO vs. FNEVY commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFOO is a Hold and FNEVY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CFOO: $0.66 vs. FNEVY: $4.53)
Brand notoriety: CFOO and FNEVY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFOO: 23% vs. FNEVY: 199%
Market capitalization -- CFOO: $50.63M vs. FNEVY: $1.19B
CFOO [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $50.63M. FNEVY’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $1.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFOO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFNEVY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFOO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FNEVY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNEVY is a better buy in the long-term than CFOO.

Price Growth

CFOO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FNEVY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +7.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNEVY is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.03% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNEVY($1.19B) has a higher market cap than CFOO($50.6M). FNEVY YTD gains are higher at: 15.742 vs. CFOO (-13.779). FNEVY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 331M vs. CFOO (-365.58K). FNEVY has more cash in the bank: 348M vs. CFOO (309K). CFOO has less debt than FNEVY: CFOO (7.12K) vs FNEVY (1.16B). FNEVY has higher revenues than CFOO: FNEVY (2.04B) vs CFOO (298K).
CFOOFNEVYCFOO / FNEVY
Capitalization50.6M1.19B4%
EBITDA-365.58K331M-0%
Gain YTD-13.77915.742-88%
P/E RatioN/A11.56-
Revenue298K2.04B0%
Total Cash309K348M0%
Total Debt7.12K1.16B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNEVY: Fundamental Ratings
FNEVY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
29
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHG27.17N/A
N/A
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
FCUS24.16N/A
N/A
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
MSOS2.56N/A
N/A
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
BULZ134.02N/A
N/A
MicroSectors™ Slct FANG Inn 3X Lvgd ETNs
BLES39.34-0.09
-0.23%
Inspire Global Hope ETF

CFOO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFOO and BABB have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFOO and BABB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFOO
1D Price
Change %
CFOO100%
N/A
BABB - CFOO
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.23%
CLBEY - CFOO
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
CFEIY - CFOO
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNEVY - CFOO
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFF - CFOO
0%
Poorly correlated
+9.87%
More

FNEVY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNEVY has been loosely correlated with TATYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNEVY jumps, then TATYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNEVY
1D Price
Change %
FNEVY100%
N/A
TATYF - FNEVY
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ORKLF - FNEVY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUEZY - FNEVY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLBEY - FNEVY
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
FPAFF - FNEVY
4%
Poorly correlated
+9.87%
More