CFOO
Price
$0.66
Change
-$0.09 (-12.00%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
50.63M
FPAFF
Price
$0.68
Change
-$0.07 (-9.33%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFOO vs FPAFF

Header iconCFOO vs FPAFF Comparison
Open Charts CFOO vs FPAFFBanner chart's image
China Foods Holdings
Price$0.66
Change-$0.09 (-12.00%)
Volume$478
Capitalization50.63M
First Pacific
Price$0.68
Change-$0.07 (-9.33%)
Volume$10.2K
Capitalization1.53B
CFOO vs FPAFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFOO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPAFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFOO vs. FPAFF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFOO is a Hold and FPAFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CFOO: $0.66 vs. FPAFF: $0.68)
Brand notoriety: CFOO and FPAFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFOO: 75% vs. FPAFF: 60%
Market capitalization -- CFOO: $50.63M vs. FPAFF: $1.53B
CFOO [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $50.63M. FPAFF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $1.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFOO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFPAFF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CFOO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FPAFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPAFF is a better buy in the long-term than CFOO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFOO’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FPAFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFOO’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • FPAFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CFOO and FPAFF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CFOO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FPAFF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -9.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.77% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPAFF($1.53B) has a higher market cap than CFOO($50.6M). FPAFF YTD gains are higher at: 20.124 vs. CFOO (-13.779). FPAFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.25B vs. CFOO (-365.58K). FPAFF has more cash in the bank: 2.81B vs. CFOO (309K). CFOO has less debt than FPAFF: CFOO (7.12K) vs FPAFF (11.2B). FPAFF has higher revenues than CFOO: FPAFF (9.95B) vs CFOO (298K).
CFOOFPAFFCFOO / FPAFF
Capitalization50.6M1.53B3%
EBITDA-365.58K2.25B-0%
Gain YTD-13.77920.124-68%
P/E RatioN/A3.90-
Revenue298K9.95B0%
Total Cash309K2.81B0%
Total Debt7.12K11.2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FPAFF: Fundamental Ratings
FPAFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFOOFPAFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFOO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPAFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JMGPX52.120.67
+1.30%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth R3
AMCGX10.450.12
+1.16%
Alger Mid Cap Growth B
DCREX12.580.07
+0.56%
Dunham Real Estate Stock C
EEMCX13.490.07
+0.52%
Columbia Emerging Markets C
FBKFX16.810.08
+0.48%
Fidelity Balanced K6

CFOO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFOO and BABB have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFOO and BABB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFOO
1D Price
Change %
CFOO100%
N/A
BABB - CFOO
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
CLBEY - CFOO
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFEIY - CFOO
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNEVY - CFOO
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFF - CFOO
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FPAFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPAFF and BRRLY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPAFF and BRRLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPAFF
1D Price
Change %
FPAFF100%
N/A
BRRLY - FPAFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.75%
CUSI - FPAFF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFY - FPAFF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
CIADY - FPAFF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
CIADF - FPAFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More