CFPUF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
18.22M
ITP
Price
$0.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 8, 12:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.39M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFPUF vs ITP

Header iconCFPUF vs ITP Comparison
Open Charts CFPUF vs ITPBanner chart's image
Canfor Pulp Products
Price$0.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.71K
Capitalization18.22M
IT Tech Packaging
Price$0.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization4.39M
CFPUF vs ITP Comparison Chart in %
CFPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ITP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFPUF vs. ITP commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFPUF is a Buy and ITP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CFPUF: $0.30 vs. ITP: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: CFPUF and ITP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFPUF: 95% vs. ITP: 7%
Market capitalization -- CFPUF: $18.22M vs. ITP: $4.39M
CFPUF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $18.22M. ITP’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $4.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $13.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFPUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileITP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CFPUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ITP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ITP is a better buy in the long-term than CFPUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFPUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ITP’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFPUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ITP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFPUF is a better buy in the short-term than ITP.

Price Growth

CFPUF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а +10.70% price change this week, while ITP (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -10.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -3.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (-3.17% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFPUF($18.2M) has a higher market cap than ITP($4.39M). CFPUF YTD gains are higher at: -38.778 vs. ITP (-56.934). ITP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.06M vs. CFPUF (-153.8M). ITP has more cash in the bank: 6.47M vs. CFPUF (1.3M). ITP has less debt than CFPUF: ITP (10.2M) vs CFPUF (76.6M). CFPUF has higher revenues than ITP: CFPUF (730M) vs ITP (78.4M).
CFPUFITPCFPUF / ITP
Capitalization18.2M4.39M414%
EBITDA-153.8M4.06M-3,784%
Gain YTD-38.778-56.93468%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue730M78.4M931%
Total Cash1.3M6.47M20%
Total Debt76.6M10.2M751%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFPUF vs ITP: Fundamental Ratings
CFPUF
ITP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2784
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9894
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9544
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9998
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ITP's Valuation (64) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CFPUF (65) in the null industry. This means that ITP’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

ITP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CFPUF (100) in the null industry. This means that ITP’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

ITP's SMR Rating (94) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CFPUF (98) in the null industry. This means that ITP’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

ITP's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Pulp And Paper industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFPUF (95) in the null industry. This means that ITP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

ITP's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CFPUF (99) in the null industry. This means that ITP’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFPUFITP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ITP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARDT14.620.22
+1.53%
Ardent Health Inc
SRL5.59N/A
N/A
Scully Royalty Ltd
AAM10.52-0.01
-0.09%
AA Mission Acquisition Corp
RBC373.47-0.98
-0.26%
RBC Bearings
AREB5.71-1.79
-23.87%
American Rebel Holdings Inc.

CFPUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFPUF and ITP have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFPUF and ITP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFPUF
1D Price
Change %
CFPUF100%
N/A
ITP - CFPUF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
SUZ - CFPUF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
BLRDF - CFPUF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MERC - CFPUF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
KLBAY - CFPUF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
More

ITP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ITP and UPMKF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ITP and UPMKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ITP
1D Price
Change %
ITP100%
+0.82%
UPMKF - ITP
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFPUF - ITP
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLRDY - ITP
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LMPMF - ITP
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SEOAY - ITP
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
More