Ad is loading...
CFPUF
Price
$0.66
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 30 closing price
ITP
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

CFPUF vs ITP

Header iconCFPUF vs ITP Comparison
Open Charts CFPUF vs ITPBanner chart's image
Canfor Pulp Products
Price$0.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
IT Tech Packaging
Price$0.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$856.96K
CapitalizationN/A
CFPUF vs ITP Comparison Chart
Loading...
ITP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFPUF vs. ITP commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFPUF is a Hold and ITP is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CFPUF: $0.66 vs. ITP: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: CFPUF and ITP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFPUF: 6% vs. ITP: 666%
Market capitalization -- CFPUF: $81.42M vs. ITP: $2.67M
CFPUF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $81.42M. ITP’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $2.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $17.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFPUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileITP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CFPUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ITP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ITP is a better buy in the long-term than CFPUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ITP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ITP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 8 bearish.

Price Growth

CFPUF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ITP (@Pulp & Paper) price change was +2.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

ITP is expected to report earnings on Nov 15, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (-2.52% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CFPUF($81.4M) has a higher market cap than ITP($2.67M). CFPUF has higher P/E ratio than ITP: CFPUF (7.05) vs ITP (4.36). ITP YTD gains are higher at: -19.006 vs. CFPUF (-50.537). ITP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.5M vs. CFPUF (-34.9M). CFPUF has more cash in the bank: 21.1M vs. ITP (9.44M). ITP has less debt than CFPUF: ITP (12.7M) vs CFPUF (109M). CFPUF has higher revenues than ITP: CFPUF (876M) vs ITP (87M).
CFPUFITPCFPUF / ITP
Capitalization81.4M2.67M3,052%
EBITDA-34.9M9.5M-367%
Gain YTD-50.537-19.006266%
P/E Ratio7.054.36162%
Revenue876M87M1,007%
Total Cash21.1M9.44M224%
Total Debt109M12.7M858%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFPUF vs ITP: Fundamental Ratings
CFPUF
ITP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5054
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9689
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9998
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ITP's Valuation (50) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CFPUF (55) in the null industry. This means that ITP’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

ITP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CFPUF (100) in the null industry. This means that ITP’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

ITP's SMR Rating (89) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CFPUF (96) in the null industry. This means that ITP’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

ITP's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CFPUF (62) in the null industry. This means that ITP’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

ITP's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CFPUF (99) in the null industry. This means that ITP’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ITP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ITP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BITF2.250.14
+6.64%
Bitfarms Ltd
RIOT12.370.51
+4.26%
Riot Platforms
MGM37.28-0.24
-0.64%
MGM Resorts International
HNRG12.85-0.53
-3.96%
Hallador Energy Company
GSUN2.81-0.18
-6.02%
Golden Sun Health Technology Group Limited

CFPUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFPUF and ITP have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFPUF and ITP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFPUF
1D Price
Change %
CFPUF100%
N/A
ITP - CFPUF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
SUZ - CFPUF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
BLRDF - CFPUF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MERC - CFPUF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
KLBAY - CFPUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ITP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ITP and SLVM have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ITP and SLVM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ITP
1D Price
Change %
ITP100%
-1.57%
SLVM - ITP
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
UPMKF - ITP
10%
Poorly correlated
+6.92%
CFPUF - ITP
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLRDY - ITP
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LMPMF - ITP
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More