CFPUF
Price
$0.54
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 16 closing price
Capitalization
81.42M
MERC
Price
$4.47
Change
-$0.05 (-1.11%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
667.24M
3 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CFPUF vs MERC

Header iconCFPUF vs MERC Comparison
Open Charts CFPUF vs MERCBanner chart's image
Canfor Pulp Products
Price$0.54
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.55K
Capitalization81.42M
Mercer International
Price$4.47
Change-$0.05 (-1.11%)
Volume$493.98K
Capitalization667.24M
CFPUF vs MERC Comparison Chart
Loading...
MERC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFPUF vs. MERC commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFPUF is a Hold and MERC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CFPUF: $0.54 vs. MERC: $4.47)
Brand notoriety: CFPUF and MERC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFPUF: 33% vs. MERC: 111%
Market capitalization -- CFPUF: $81.42M vs. MERC: $667.24M
CFPUF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $81.42M. MERC’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $667.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $17.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFPUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMERC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFPUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MERC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MERC is a better buy in the long-term than CFPUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MERC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MERC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CFPUF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MERC (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -9.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

MERC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+1.31% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MERC($667M) has a higher market cap than CFPUF($81.4M). CFPUF has higher P/E ratio than MERC: CFPUF (7.05) vs MERC (4.38). CFPUF YTD gains are higher at: 9.290 vs. MERC (-30.448). MERC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -9.08M vs. CFPUF (-34.9M). MERC has more cash in the bank: 314M vs. CFPUF (21.1M). CFPUF has less debt than MERC: CFPUF (109M) vs MERC (1.63B). MERC has higher revenues than CFPUF: MERC (1.99B) vs CFPUF (876M).
CFPUFMERCCFPUF / MERC
Capitalization81.4M667M12%
EBITDA-34.9M-9.08M385%
Gain YTD9.290-30.448-31%
P/E Ratio7.054.38161%
Revenue876M1.99B44%
Total Cash21.1M314M7%
Total Debt109M1.63B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFPUF vs MERC: Fundamental Ratings
CFPUF
MERC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5061
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9592
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6092
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9816
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFPUF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MERC (50) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that CFPUF’s stock grew similarly to MERC’s over the last 12 months.

CFPUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MERC (100) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that CFPUF’s stock grew similarly to MERC’s over the last 12 months.

MERC's SMR Rating (92) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as CFPUF (95) in the null industry. This means that MERC’s stock grew similarly to CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

CFPUF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as MERC (92) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that CFPUF’s stock grew similarly to MERC’s over the last 12 months.

MERC's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Pulp And Paper industry is significantly better than the same rating for CFPUF (98) in the null industry. This means that MERC’s stock grew significantly faster than CFPUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MERC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MERC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NNDM1.650.10
+6.45%
Nano Dimension Ltd
TNXP17.820.63
+3.66%
Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp
FULT16.690.09
+0.54%
Fulton Financial Corp
HTHT33.75-0.78
-2.26%
H World Group Limited
AUUD3.37-0.09
-2.60%
Auddia Inc

CFPUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFPUF and ITP have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFPUF and ITP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFPUF
1D Price
Change %
CFPUF100%
N/A
ITP - CFPUF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
SUZ - CFPUF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
BLRDF - CFPUF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MERC - CFPUF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
KLBAY - CFPUF
5%
Poorly correlated
+6.38%
More

MERC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MERC has been loosely correlated with SLVM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MERC jumps, then SLVM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MERC
1D Price
Change %
MERC100%
-1.11%
SLVM - MERC
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
SEOAY - MERC
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
MONDY - MERC
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
UPMMY - MERC
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
MAGN - MERC
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
More