CFPZF
Price
$9.62
Change
-$0.06 (-0.62%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.09B
WFG
Price
$72.29
Change
-$2.64 (-3.52%)
Updated
Aug 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.9B
56 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFPZF vs WFG

Header iconCFPZF vs WFG Comparison
Open Charts CFPZF vs WFGBanner chart's image
Canfor
Price$9.62
Change-$0.06 (-0.62%)
Volume$41.6K
Capitalization1.09B
West Fraser Timber
Price$72.29
Change-$2.64 (-3.52%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization5.9B
CFPZF vs WFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFPZF vs. WFG commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFPZF is a Hold and WFG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CFPZF: $9.44 vs. WFG: $72.31)
Brand notoriety: CFPZF and WFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Forest Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFPZF: 13% vs. WFG: 82%
Market capitalization -- CFPZF: $1.09B vs. WFG: $5.9B
CFPZF [@Forest Products] is valued at $1.09B. WFG’s [@Forest Products] market capitalization is $5.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $8.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $1.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFPZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFPZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WFG is a better buy in the long-term than CFPZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFPZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFPZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WFG is a better buy in the short-term than CFPZF.

Price Growth

CFPZF (@Forest Products) experienced а +3.35% price change this week, while WFG (@Forest Products) price change was +0.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

WFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Forest Products (-0.05% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFG($5.9B) has a higher market cap than CFPZF($1.09B). CFPZF YTD gains are higher at: -8.729 vs. WFG (-12.683). WFG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 432M vs. CFPZF (-323M). WFG has more cash in the bank: 646M vs. CFPZF (113M). WFG has less debt than CFPZF: WFG (329M) vs CFPZF (725M). WFG has higher revenues than CFPZF: WFG (5.83B) vs CFPZF (5.29B).
CFPZFWFGCFPZF / WFG
Capitalization1.09B5.9B19%
EBITDA-323M432M-75%
Gain YTD-8.729-12.68369%
P/E RatioN/A57.61-
Revenue5.29B5.83B91%
Total Cash113M646M17%
Total Debt725M329M220%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFPZF vs WFG: Fundamental Ratings
CFPZF
WFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5057
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10051
SMR RATING
1..100
9591
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7658
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
185
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WFG's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFPZF (69). This means that WFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFPZF’s over the last 12 months.

WFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFPZF (100). This means that WFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFPZF’s over the last 12 months.

WFG's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CFPZF (95). This means that WFG’s stock grew similarly to CFPZF’s over the last 12 months.

WFG's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as CFPZF (76). This means that WFG’s stock grew similarly to CFPZF’s over the last 12 months.

CFPZF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WFG (85). This means that CFPZF’s stock grew significantly faster than WFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFPZFWFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LAVPX15.97N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity P
NMCCX6.83N/A
N/A
Voya MidCap Opportunities C
WBAIX17.21N/A
N/A
Weitz Conservative Allocation-Instl Cl
RAACX9.89N/A
N/A
Altegris/AACA Opportunistic Real Estt C
GFDDX104.27N/A
N/A
Invesco Global R5

CFPZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFPZF has been loosely correlated with IFSPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFPZF jumps, then IFSPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFPZF
1D Price
Change %
CFPZF100%
-0.62%
IFSPF - CFPZF
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.44%
WFG - CFPZF
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
UFPI - CFPZF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
SSD - CFPZF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
ACAZF - CFPZF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
More

WFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFG has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WFG jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFG
1D Price
Change %
WFG100%
-0.16%
BCC - WFG
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
CFPZF - WFG
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
UFPI - WFG
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
SSD - WFG
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
IFSPF - WFG
46%
Loosely correlated
+3.44%
More