Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFRZX vs PFFRX
CFRZX vs PFFRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFRZX vs. PFFRX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFRZX is a Hold and PFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.68B vs. CFRZX (745M). PFFRX (7.93) and CFRZX (7.92) have matching dividends . CFRZX was incepted earlier than PFFRX: CFRZX (15 years) vs PFFRX (15 years). CFRZX (0.78) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.70). CFRZX (80.00) and PFFRX (78.50) have comparable annual turnover. CFRZX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: CFRZX (2000) vs PFFRX (2500). PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.25 vs. CFRZX (6.81). CFRZX (40.67) and PFFRX (40.04) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CFRZX | PFFRX | CFRZX / PFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.70 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.70 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.586 | 1.512 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 745M | 4.68B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.92 | 7.93 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.81 | 7.25 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.91 | 27.52 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.67 | 40.04 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.17 | 58.48 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement