CFSB
Price
$7.50
Change
-$0.15 (-1.96%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
47.76M
SBT
Price
$4.61
Change
-$0.04 (-0.86%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
260.34M
70 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CFSB vs SBT

Header iconCFSB vs SBT Comparison
Open Charts CFSB vs SBTBanner chart's image
CFSB Ban
Price$7.50
Change-$0.15 (-1.96%)
Volume$19.21K
Capitalization47.76M
Sterling Ban
Price$4.61
Change-$0.04 (-0.86%)
Volume$19.71K
Capitalization260.34M
CFSB vs SBT Comparison Chart
Loading...
SBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFSB vs. SBT commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSB is a Hold and SBT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CFSB: $7.50 vs. SBT: $4.61)
Brand notoriety: CFSB and SBT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFSB: 332% vs. SBT: 68%
Market capitalization -- CFSB: $47.76M vs. SBT: $260.34M
CFSB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $47.76M. SBT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $260.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFSB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFSB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFSB is a better buy in the long-term than SBT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SBT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CFSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.40% price change this week, while SBT (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFSB is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2023.

SBT is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBT($260M) has a higher market cap than CFSB($47.8M). CFSB has higher P/E ratio than SBT: CFSB (127.33) vs SBT (33.33). CFSB YTD gains are higher at: 10.948 vs. SBT (-3.151). CFSB has less debt than SBT: CFSB (20M) vs SBT (62.5M). SBT has higher revenues than CFSB: SBT (67.7M) vs CFSB (8.14M).
CFSBSBTCFSB / SBT
Capitalization47.8M260M18%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.948-3.151-347%
P/E Ratio127.3333.33382%
Revenue8.14M67.7M12%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt20M62.5M32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBT: Fundamental Ratings
SBT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
58
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RRGCX7.11-0.06
-0.84%
DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Secc C
JSCVX22.51-0.49
-2.13%
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value T
FICHX13.26-0.30
-2.21%
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl Inst
HTCIX24.26-0.60
-2.41%
Hennessy Technology Institutional
OTFCX42.05-1.22
-2.82%
Invesco Discovery Large Cap C

CFSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFSB has been loosely correlated with BPRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFSB jumps, then BPRN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFSB
1D Price
Change %
CFSB100%
-1.96%
BPRN - CFSB
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
ZION - CFSB
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.08%
SBT - CFSB
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
FVCB - CFSB
34%
Loosely correlated
-5.07%
INBK - CFSB
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.00%
More

SBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBT has been loosely correlated with BLFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBT jumps, then BLFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBT
1D Price
Change %
SBT100%
-0.86%
BLFY - SBT
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
FMAO - SBT
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.22%
WTBA - SBT
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
SMBK - SBT
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
FCBC - SBT
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
More