Ad is loading...
CFSIX vs VIGRX
CFSIX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts CFSIX vs VIGRX
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Y
Price$15.76
Change+$0.16 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2B
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$185.55
Change+$3.72 (+2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.76B
CFSIX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSIX vs. VIGRX commentary
Apr 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSIX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. CFSIX (2B). VIGRX pays higher dividends than CFSIX: VIGRX (0.39) vs CFSIX (0.00). CFSIX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: CFSIX (21 years) vs VIGRX (32 years). CFSIX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). CFSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. VIGRX (5.00). CFSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: CFSIX (2500) vs VIGRX (3000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.11 vs. CFSIX (-5.85). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 114.93 vs. CFSIX (26.89).
| CFSIX | VIGRX | CFSIX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.17 | 512% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.17 | 518% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.955 | -12.182 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 261B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.85 | 4.11 | -142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.57 | 33.01 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.89 | 114.93 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.21 | 232.42 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...