Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSMX vs JVMSX
CFSMX vs JVMSX Comparison
Open Charts CFSMX vs JVMSX
Clarkston Partners Founders
Price$13.42
Change+$0.15 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets959.93M
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R2
Price$28.86
Change+$0.07 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.44B
CFSMX vs JVMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSMX vs. JVMSX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSMX is a Buy and JVMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMSX has more cash in the bank: 22.4B vs. CFSMX (960M). CFSMX pays higher dividends than JVMSX: CFSMX (0.55) vs JVMSX (0.42). CFSMX was incepted earlier than JVMSX: CFSMX (10 years) vs JVMSX (13 years). JVMSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than CFSMX (0.88). JVMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. CFSMX (22.00). JVMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFSMX: JVMSX (0) vs CFSMX (100000000). JVMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.55 vs. CFSMX (-1.59). JVMSX return over 5 years is better than : 64.61 vs. CFSMX (17.18).
| CFSMX | JVMSX | CFSMX / JVMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.25 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.26 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.609 | 7.385 | -117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 960M | 22.4B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.42 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.59 | 2.55 | -63% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.53 | 21.54 | -58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.18 | 64.61 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers