Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSMX vs VEVYX
CFSMX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts CFSMX vs VEVYX
Clarkston Partners Founders
Price$13.68
Change+$0.13 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets904.12M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$47.01
Change+$0.25 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.03B
CFSMX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSMX vs. VEVYX commentary
Oct 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSMX is a Buy and VEVYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. CFSMX (904M). VEVYX pays higher dividends than CFSMX: VEVYX (1.02) vs CFSMX (0.54). CFSMX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: CFSMX (10 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). CFSMX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). VEVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CFSMX (22.00). VEVYX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFSMX: VEVYX (1000000) vs CFSMX (100000000). CFSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.65 vs. VEVYX (-9.00). VEVYX return over 5 years is better than : 39.28 vs. CFSMX (9.14).
| CFSMX | VEVYX | CFSMX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.66 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.66 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.680 | 2.550 | -262% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 1000000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 904M | 17B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.02 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.65 | -9.00 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.27 | 8.09 | -127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.14 | 39.28 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.02 | 54.67 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement