Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFSMX vs VEVYX
CFSMX vs VEVYX Comparison
Open Charts CFSMX vs VEVYX
Clarkston Partners Founders
Price$12.90
Change-$0.05 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets831.03M
Victory Sycamore Established Value Y
Price$44.91
Change-$0.17 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.82B
CFSMX vs VEVYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFSMX vs. VEVYX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFSMX is a Hold and VEVYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEVYX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. CFSMX (831M). VEVYX pays higher dividends than CFSMX: VEVYX (1.05) vs CFSMX (0.55). CFSMX was incepted earlier than VEVYX: CFSMX (10 years) vs VEVYX (13 years). CFSMX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VEVYX (0.66). VEVYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. CFSMX (22.00). VEVYX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFSMX: VEVYX (1000000) vs CFSMX (100000000). CFSMX (-12.90) and VEVYX (-12.99) have marching annual gain over last year. VEVYX return over 5 years is better than : 19.42 vs. CFSMX (-5.74).
| CFSMX | VEVYX | CFSMX / VEVYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.66 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.66 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.813 | -1.135 | 953% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 1000000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 831M | 15.8B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.05 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.90 | -12.99 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.08 | -2.70 | 707% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.74 | 19.42 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.93 | 42.90 | 74% |