CFTLF
Price
$0.72
Change
-$0.03 (-4.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.89B
NIPNF
Price
$28.75
Change
-$2.56 (-8.18%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
39.85B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFTLF vs NIPNF

Header iconCFTLF vs NIPNF Comparison
Open Charts CFTLF vs NIPNFBanner chart's image
Chinasoft International
Price$0.72
Change-$0.03 (-4.00%)
Volume$800
Capitalization1.89B
NEC
Price$28.75
Change-$2.56 (-8.18%)
Volume$125
Capitalization39.85B
CFTLF vs NIPNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFTLF vs. NIPNF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFTLF is a Hold and NIPNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CFTLF: $0.72 vs. NIPNF: $28.75)
Brand notoriety: CFTLF and NIPNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFTLF: 8% vs. NIPNF: 9%
Market capitalization -- CFTLF: $1.89B vs. NIPNF: $39.85B
CFTLF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $1.89B. NIPNF’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $39.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $231.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFTLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNIPNF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CFTLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NIPNF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NIPNF is a better buy in the long-term than CFTLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFTLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIPNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFTLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NIPNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFTLF is a better buy in the short-term than NIPNF.

Price Growth

CFTLF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -4.49% price change this week, while NIPNF (@Information Technology Services) price change was -8.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+0.66% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NIPNF($39.9B) has a higher market cap than CFTLF($1.89B). NIPNF has higher P/E ratio than CFTLF: NIPNF (32.36) vs CFTLF (24.69). NIPNF YTD gains are higher at: 66.243 vs. CFTLF (7.893). NIPNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 377B vs. CFTLF (907M). NIPNF has higher revenues than CFTLF: NIPNF (3.42T) vs CFTLF (16.6B).
CFTLFNIPNFCFTLF / NIPNF
Capitalization1.89B39.9B5%
EBITDA907M377B0%
Gain YTD7.89366.24312%
P/E Ratio24.6932.3676%
Revenue16.6B3.42T0%
Total Cash2.6BN/A-
Total Debt3.8BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFTLF vs NIPNF: Fundamental Ratings
CFTLF
NIPNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9987
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10013
SMR RATING
1..100
92100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1118
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
430

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFTLF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPNF (22). This means that CFTLF’s stock grew similarly to NIPNF’s over the last 12 months.

NIPNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CFTLF (100). This means that NIPNF’s stock grew significantly faster than CFTLF’s over the last 12 months.

CFTLF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPNF (100). This means that CFTLF’s stock grew similarly to NIPNF’s over the last 12 months.

NIPNF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CFTLF (49). This means that NIPNF’s stock grew similarly to CFTLF’s over the last 12 months.

CFTLF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPNF (18). This means that CFTLF’s stock grew similarly to NIPNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFTLFNIPNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
18%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
33%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIPNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SA17.730.39
+2.25%
Seabridge Gold
SLNHP2.480.03
+1.22%
Soluna Holdings
TTEK36.090.43
+1.21%
Tetra Tech Inc
CCIX10.51-0.01
-0.10%
Churchill Capital Corp IX
MNOV1.29-0.05
-4.03%
Medicinova

CFTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFTLF and TTEC have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFTLF and TTEC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFTLF
1D Price
Change %
CFTLF100%
-4.49%
TTEC - CFTLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
FJTSF - CFTLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
NIPNF - CFTLF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EAXR - CFTLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGEMY - CFTLF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
More

NIPNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIPNF and CFTLF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIPNF and CFTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIPNF
1D Price
Change %
NIPNF100%
N/A
CFTLF - NIPNF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.49%
FJTSY - NIPNF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
NTDTY - NIPNF
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.95%
FJTSF - NIPNF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
NOSUF - NIPNF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More