Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWCX vs FFGTX
CFWCX vs FFGTX Comparison
Open Charts CFWCX vs FFGTX
Calvert Global Water C
Price$27.81
Change-$0.24 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets564.6M
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$20.97
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets895.5M
CFWCX vs FFGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWCX vs. FFGTX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWCX is a Buy and FFGTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. CFWCX (565M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than CFWCX: FFGTX (1.67) vs CFWCX (0.76). CFWCX was incepted earlier than FFGTX: CFWCX (17 years) vs FFGTX (16 years). CFWCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. CFWCX (29.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFWCX: FFGTX (0) vs CFWCX (1000). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.79 vs. CFWCX (0.71). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 101.83 vs. CFWCX (42.19).
| CFWCX | FFGTX | CFWCX / FFGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.40 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 1.40 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.069 | 16.825 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 565M | 895M | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.67 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.71 | 16.79 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.02 | 16.51 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.19 | 101.83 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.90 | 128.13 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement