Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CFWCX vs FFGTX
CFWCX vs FFGTX Comparison
Open Charts CFWCX vs FFGTX
Calvert Global Water C
Price$28.64
Change+$0.12 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets566.45M
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$21.48
Change+$0.06 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets927.58M
CFWCX vs FFGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CFWCX vs. FFGTX commentary
Oct 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWCX is a Hold and FFGTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 928M vs. CFWCX (566M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than CFWCX: FFGTX (1.61) vs CFWCX (0.75). CFWCX was incepted earlier than FFGTX: CFWCX (17 years) vs FFGTX (17 years). CFWCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. CFWCX (29.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CFWCX: FFGTX (0) vs CFWCX (1000). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.42 vs. CFWCX (2.53). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 107.83 vs. CFWCX (39.16).
| CFWCX | FFGTX | CFWCX / FFGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.40 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 1.40 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.473 | 19.666 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 566M | 928M | 61% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.61 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.53 | 13.42 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.83 | 17.05 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.16 | 107.83 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.59 | 133.92 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement