CFWFF
Price
$2.51
Change
+$0.08 (+3.29%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
214.09M
CLB
Price
$12.78
Change
+$0.38 (+3.06%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
581.48M
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFWFF vs CLB

Header iconCFWFF vs CLB Comparison
Open Charts CFWFF vs CLBBanner chart's image
Calfrac Well Services
Price$2.51
Change+$0.08 (+3.29%)
Volume$400
Capitalization214.09M
Core Laboratories
Price$12.78
Change+$0.38 (+3.06%)
Volume$2.03K
Capitalization581.48M
CFWFF vs CLB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFWFF vs. CLB commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWFF is a Hold and CLB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CFWFF: $2.51 vs. CLB: $12.40)
Brand notoriety: CFWFF and CLB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFWFF: 4% vs. CLB: 54%
Market capitalization -- CFWFF: $214.09M vs. CLB: $581.48M
CFWFF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $214.09M. CLB’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $581.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $51.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFWFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CFWFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFWFF is a better buy in the long-term than CLB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFWFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFWFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CLB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CFWFF and CLB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CFWFF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +1.21% price change this week, while CLB (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -2.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+2.16% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLB($581M) has a higher market cap than CFWFF($214M). CFWFF has higher P/E ratio than CLB: CFWFF (28.95) vs CLB (20.00). CFWFF YTD gains are higher at: -5.068 vs. CLB (-28.196). CFWFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 219M vs. CLB (68.4M). CFWFF has more cash in the bank: 51.8M vs. CLB (31.2M). CLB has less debt than CFWFF: CLB (179M) vs CFWFF (373M). CFWFF has higher revenues than CLB: CFWFF (1.58B) vs CLB (517M).
CFWFFCLBCFWFF / CLB
Capitalization214M581M37%
EBITDA219M68.4M320%
Gain YTD-5.068-28.19618%
P/E Ratio28.9520.00145%
Revenue1.58B517M306%
Total Cash51.8M31.2M166%
Total Debt373M179M208%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFWFF vs CLB: Fundamental Ratings
CFWFF
CLB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1419
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9163
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7659
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
192
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLB's Valuation (70) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as CFWFF (73) in the null industry. This means that CLB’s stock grew similarly to CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

CLB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as CFWFF (100) in the null industry. This means that CLB’s stock grew similarly to CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

CLB's SMR Rating (63) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as CFWFF (91) in the null industry. This means that CLB’s stock grew similarly to CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

CLB's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as CFWFF (76) in the null industry. This means that CLB’s stock grew similarly to CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

CFWFF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLB (92) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CFWFF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFWFFCLB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESAGX13.34N/A
N/A
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG A
CCRZX16.43N/A
N/A
Columbia Disciplined Core Inst
VMFGX475.18N/A
N/A
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Idx I
OTCRX14.23N/A
N/A
Otter Creek Long/Short Opportunity Inv
ZGFIX19.85-0.07
-0.35%
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs R5

CFWFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFWFF and NOA have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFWFF and NOA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFWFF
1D Price
Change %
CFWFF100%
+3.29%
NOA - CFWFF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
CLB - CFWFF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
TOLWF - CFWFF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
HAL - CFWFF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
NOV - CFWFF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
More