CFWFF
Price
$2.23
Change
-$0.02 (-0.89%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
190.7M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GZPZY
Price
$41.95
Change
+$0.47 (+1.13%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
7.67B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFWFF vs GZPZY

Header iconCFWFF vs GZPZY Comparison
Open Charts CFWFF vs GZPZYBanner chart's image
Calfrac Well Services
Price$2.23
Change-$0.02 (-0.89%)
Volume$76.66K
Capitalization190.7M
Gaztransport & Tecnigaz
Price$41.95
Change+$0.47 (+1.13%)
Volume$295
Capitalization7.67B
CFWFF vs GZPZY Comparison Chart in %
CFWFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GZPZY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFWFF vs. GZPZY commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWFF is a Hold and GZPZY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CFWFF: $2.23 vs. GZPZY: $41.95)
Brand notoriety: CFWFF and GZPZY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFWFF: 1448% vs. GZPZY: 14%
Market capitalization -- CFWFF: $190.93M vs. GZPZY: $7.58B
CFWFF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $190.93M. GZPZY’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $7.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $53.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFWFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGZPZY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFWFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GZPZY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GZPZY is a better buy in the long-term than CFWFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFWFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GZPZY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFWFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GZPZY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFWFF is a better buy in the short-term than GZPZY.

Price Growth

CFWFF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +0.45% price change this week, while GZPZY (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +5.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-1.58% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GZPZY($7.67B) has a higher market cap than CFWFF($191M). CFWFF has higher P/E ratio than GZPZY: CFWFF (26.05) vs GZPZY (18.77). GZPZY YTD gains are higher at: 63.033 vs. CFWFF (-15.658). GZPZY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 543M vs. CFWFF (219M). GZPZY has more cash in the bank: 360M vs. CFWFF (51.8M). CFWFF has higher revenues than GZPZY: CFWFF (1.58B) vs GZPZY (735M).
CFWFFGZPZYCFWFF / GZPZY
Capitalization191M7.67B2%
EBITDA219M543M40%
Gain YTD-15.65863.033-25%
P/E Ratio26.0518.77139%
Revenue1.58B735M216%
Total Cash51.8M360M14%
Total Debt373MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFWFF: Fundamental Ratings
CFWFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
16
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFWFFGZPZY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFWFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GZPZY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSDD11.100.41
+3.84%
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF
BTCI48.370.60
+1.26%
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
FTF6.050.02
+0.33%
Franklin Limited
FTGS34.12-0.08
-0.25%
First Trust Growth Strength ETF
GXDW24.76-0.21
-0.85%
Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF

CFWFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFWFF and NOA have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFWFF and NOA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFWFF
1D Price
Change %
CFWFF100%
-0.89%
NOA - CFWFF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
CLB - CFWFF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
TOLWF - CFWFF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
HAL - CFWFF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
NOV - CFWFF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
More

GZPZY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GZPZY and CFWFF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GZPZY and CFWFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GZPZY
1D Price
Change %
GZPZY100%
+1.13%
CFWFF - GZPZY
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
TOLWF - GZPZY
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
THNPY - GZPZY
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
ACDC - GZPZY
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
THNPF - GZPZY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More