CFWFF
Price
$2.47
Change
+$0.04 (+1.65%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
212.32M
GZPZY
Price
$36.86
Change
-$0.30 (-0.81%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
6.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFWFF vs GZPZY

Header iconCFWFF vs GZPZY Comparison
Open Charts CFWFF vs GZPZYBanner chart's image
Calfrac Well Services
Price$2.47
Change+$0.04 (+1.65%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization212.32M
Gaztransport & Tecnigaz
Price$36.86
Change-$0.30 (-0.81%)
Volume$603
Capitalization6.76B
CFWFF vs GZPZY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GZPZY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFWFF vs. GZPZY commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWFF is a Hold and GZPZY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CFWFF: $2.47 vs. GZPZY: $36.86)
Brand notoriety: CFWFF and GZPZY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFWFF: 8% vs. GZPZY: 74%
Market capitalization -- CFWFF: $212.32M vs. GZPZY: $6.76B
CFWFF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $212.32M. GZPZY’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $6.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $54.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFWFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGZPZY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CFWFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GZPZY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GZPZY is a better buy in the long-term than CFWFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFWFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GZPZY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFWFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • GZPZY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GZPZY is a better buy in the short-term than CFWFF.

Price Growth

CFWFF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -0.56% price change this week, while GZPZY (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.83% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GZPZY($6.76B) has a higher market cap than CFWFF($212M). CFWFF has higher P/E ratio than GZPZY: CFWFF (28.43) vs GZPZY (16.46). GZPZY YTD gains are higher at: 43.252 vs. CFWFF (-6.732). GZPZY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 543M vs. CFWFF (219M). GZPZY has more cash in the bank: 360M vs. CFWFF (51.8M). CFWFF has higher revenues than GZPZY: CFWFF (1.58B) vs GZPZY (735M).
CFWFFGZPZYCFWFF / GZPZY
Capitalization212M6.76B3%
EBITDA219M543M40%
Gain YTD-6.73243.252-16%
P/E Ratio28.4316.46173%
Revenue1.58B735M216%
Total Cash51.8M360M14%
Total Debt373MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFWFF: Fundamental Ratings
CFWFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFWFFGZPZY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GZPZY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FPX153.552.94
+1.95%
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
CPSL26.730.04
+0.17%
Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF
FTSD91.04-0.07
-0.08%
Franklin Short Duration US Govt ETF
MZZ8.29-0.02
-0.26%
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
FCA27.49-0.49
-1.75%
First Trust China AlphaDEX® ETF

CFWFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFWFF and NOA have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFWFF and NOA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFWFF
1D Price
Change %
CFWFF100%
+1.27%
NOA - CFWFF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
CLB - CFWFF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
TOLWF - CFWFF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.70%
HAL - CFWFF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
NOV - CFWFF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
More

GZPZY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GZPZY and CFWFF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GZPZY and CFWFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GZPZY
1D Price
Change %
GZPZY100%
N/A
CFWFF - GZPZY
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
TOLWF - GZPZY
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.70%
THNPY - GZPZY
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
ACDC - GZPZY
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
THNPF - GZPZY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More