CFWFF
Price
$2.58
Change
+$0.08 (+3.20%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
322.08M
HAL
Price
$21.51
Change
-$0.20 (-0.92%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
35.54B
19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFWFF vs HAL

Header iconCFWFF vs HAL Comparison
Open Charts CFWFF vs HALBanner chart's image
Calfrac Well Services
Price$2.58
Change+$0.08 (+3.20%)
Volume$1.15K
Capitalization322.08M
Halliburton
Price$21.51
Change-$0.20 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization35.54B
CFWFF vs HAL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFWFF vs. HAL commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWFF is a StrongBuy and HAL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CFWFF: $2.50 vs. HAL: $21.52)
Brand notoriety: CFWFF: Not notable vs. HAL: Notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFWFF: 33% vs. HAL: 49%
Market capitalization -- CFWFF: $322.08M vs. HAL: $35.54B
CFWFF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $322.08M. HAL’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $35.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFWFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHAL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CFWFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HAL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFWFF is a better buy in the long-term than HAL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFWFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFWFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HAL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFWFF is a better buy in the short-term than HAL.

Price Growth

CFWFF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +0.44% price change this week, while HAL (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +4.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

HAL is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.62% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAL($35.5B) has a higher market cap than CFWFF($322M). HAL has higher P/E ratio than CFWFF: HAL (13.67) vs CFWFF (3.98). CFWFF YTD gains are higher at: -5.371 vs. HAL (-19.623). HAL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.94B vs. CFWFF (264M). HAL has more cash in the bank: 2.26B vs. CFWFF (23.2M). CFWFF has less debt than HAL: CFWFF (365M) vs HAL (8.81B). HAL has higher revenues than CFWFF: HAL (23B) vs CFWFF (1.7B).
CFWFFHALCFWFF / HAL
Capitalization322M35.5B1%
EBITDA264M4.94B5%
Gain YTD-5.371-19.62327%
P/E Ratio3.9813.6729%
Revenue1.7B23B7%
Total Cash23.2M2.26B1%
Total Debt365M8.81B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFWFF vs HAL: Fundamental Ratings
CFWFF
HAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8974
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10069
SMR RATING
1..100
8643
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5963
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
281
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFWFF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as HAL (81) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CFWFF’s stock grew similarly to HAL’s over the last 12 months.

HAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as CFWFF (100) in the null industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew similarly to CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

HAL's SMR Rating (43) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFWFF (86) in the null industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

CFWFF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as HAL (63) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CFWFF’s stock grew similarly to HAL’s over the last 12 months.

CFWFF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HAL (81) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that CFWFF’s stock grew significantly faster than HAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFWFFHAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ROKT66.081.16
+1.78%
SPDR® Kensho Final Frontiers ETF
ADX21.900.30
+1.39%
Adams Diversified Equity Fund
HTUS40.210.24
+0.59%
Hull Tactical US ETF
HEGD23.680.12
+0.52%
Swan Hedged Equity US Large Cap ETF
USAF26.43-0.03
-0.13%
Atlas America Fund

CFWFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFWFF and NOA have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFWFF and NOA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFWFF
1D Price
Change %
CFWFF100%
-3.02%
NOA - CFWFF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
CLB - CFWFF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
TOLWF - CFWFF
29%
Poorly correlated
+16.59%
HAL - CFWFF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
NOV - CFWFF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
More

HAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAL has been closely correlated with CHX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAL jumps, then CHX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAL
1D Price
Change %
HAL100%
-0.88%
CHX - HAL
86%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
SLB - HAL
86%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
NOV - HAL
83%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
LBRT - HAL
80%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
RES - HAL
80%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
More