CFWFF
Price
$2.47
Change
+$0.04 (+1.65%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
212.32M
THNPF
Price
$47.44
Change
+$0.55 (+1.17%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
8.17B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFWFF vs THNPF

Header iconCFWFF vs THNPF Comparison
Open Charts CFWFF vs THNPFBanner chart's image
Calfrac Well Services
Price$2.47
Change+$0.04 (+1.65%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization212.32M
Technip Energies
Price$47.44
Change+$0.55 (+1.17%)
Volume$626
Capitalization8.17B
CFWFF vs THNPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
THNPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFWFF vs. THNPF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWFF is a Hold and THNPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CFWFF: $2.47 vs. THNPF: $47.44)
Brand notoriety: CFWFF and THNPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFWFF: 8% vs. THNPF: 221%
Market capitalization -- CFWFF: $212.32M vs. THNPF: $8.17B
CFWFF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $212.32M. THNPF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $8.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $54.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFWFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTHNPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CFWFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • THNPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, THNPF is a better buy in the long-term than CFWFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFWFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while THNPF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFWFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • THNPF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, THNPF is a better buy in the short-term than CFWFF.

Price Growth

CFWFF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -0.56% price change this week, while THNPF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.83% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
THNPF($8.17B) has a higher market cap than CFWFF($212M). CFWFF has higher P/E ratio than THNPF: CFWFF (28.43) vs THNPF (18.53). THNPF YTD gains are higher at: 78.025 vs. CFWFF (-6.732). THNPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 723M vs. CFWFF (219M). THNPF has more cash in the bank: 3.88B vs. CFWFF (51.8M). CFWFF has less debt than THNPF: CFWFF (373M) vs THNPF (987M). THNPF has higher revenues than CFWFF: THNPF (7.28B) vs CFWFF (1.58B).
CFWFFTHNPFCFWFF / THNPF
Capitalization212M8.17B3%
EBITDA219M723M30%
Gain YTD-6.73278.025-9%
P/E Ratio28.4318.53153%
Revenue1.58B7.28B22%
Total Cash51.8M3.88B1%
Total Debt373M987M38%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFWFF: Fundamental Ratings
CFWFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFWFFTHNPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
THNPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAGEX18.980.12
+0.64%
Calamos Global Equity A
EGINX35.47N/A
N/A
Invesco International Value Investor
FMILX66.48N/A
N/A
Fidelity New Millennium
ABRWX18.31N/A
N/A
DSS AmericaFirstMonthlyRisk-OnRisk-Off I
BRXCX15.85N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Intl Eq C

CFWFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFWFF and NOA have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFWFF and NOA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFWFF
1D Price
Change %
CFWFF100%
+1.27%
NOA - CFWFF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
CLB - CFWFF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
TOLWF - CFWFF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.70%
HAL - CFWFF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
NOV - CFWFF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
More

THNPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that THNPF and THNPY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that THNPF and THNPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To THNPF
1D Price
Change %
THNPF100%
N/A
THNPY - THNPF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
ACDC - THNPF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
GZPZY - THNPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFWFF - THNPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
XPRO - THNPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
More