CFWFF
Price
$2.58
Change
+$0.08 (+3.20%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
322.08M
TOLWF
Price
$3.31
Change
-$0.18 (-5.14%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
685.7M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFWFF vs TOLWF

Header iconCFWFF vs TOLWF Comparison
Open Charts CFWFF vs TOLWFBanner chart's image
Calfrac Well Services
Price$2.58
Change+$0.08 (+3.20%)
Volume$1.15K
Capitalization322.08M
Trican Well Service
Price$3.31
Change-$0.18 (-5.14%)
Volume$69.4K
Capitalization685.7M
CFWFF vs TOLWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CFWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TOLWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFWFF vs. TOLWF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFWFF is a StrongBuy and TOLWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CFWFF: $2.50 vs. TOLWF: $3.87)
Brand notoriety: CFWFF and TOLWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFWFF: 33% vs. TOLWF: 102%
Market capitalization -- CFWFF: $322.08M vs. TOLWF: $685.7M
CFWFF [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $322.08M. TOLWF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $685.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFWFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTOLWF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFWFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TOLWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TOLWF is a better buy in the long-term than CFWFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFWFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TOLWF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFWFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TOLWF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFWFF is a better buy in the short-term than TOLWF.

Price Growth

CFWFF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +0.44% price change this week, while TOLWF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +18.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

TOLWF is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.62% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOLWF($686M) has a higher market cap than CFWFF($322M). TOLWF has higher P/E ratio than CFWFF: TOLWF (8.72) vs CFWFF (3.98). TOLWF YTD gains are higher at: 8.873 vs. CFWFF (-5.371). CFWFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 264M vs. TOLWF (234M). TOLWF has more cash in the bank: 25.2M vs. CFWFF (23.2M). TOLWF has less debt than CFWFF: TOLWF (47.8M) vs CFWFF (365M). CFWFF has higher revenues than TOLWF: CFWFF (1.7B) vs TOLWF (944M).
CFWFFTOLWFCFWFF / TOLWF
Capitalization322M686M47%
EBITDA264M234M113%
Gain YTD-5.3718.873-61%
P/E Ratio3.988.7246%
Revenue1.7B944M180%
Total Cash23.2M25.2M92%
Total Debt365M47.8M764%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFWFF vs TOLWF: Fundamental Ratings
CFWFF
TOLWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8960
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10029
SMR RATING
1..100
8646
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
260
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TOLWF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as CFWFF (53). This means that TOLWF’s stock grew similarly to CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

TOLWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CFWFF (100). This means that TOLWF’s stock grew significantly faster than CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

TOLWF's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFWFF (86). This means that TOLWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

TOLWF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CFWFF (59). This means that TOLWF’s stock grew similarly to CFWFF’s over the last 12 months.

CFWFF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TOLWF (60). This means that CFWFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TOLWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFWFFTOLWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TOLWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITHTX56.19N/A
N/A
Hartford Capital Appreciation R5
RYAEX119.65N/A
N/A
Rydex Europe 1.25x Strategy A
MUSBX35.42N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Core Equity B
GCLSX24.51N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts Svc
SDVRX25.67N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val R

CFWFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFWFF and NOA have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFWFF and NOA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFWFF
1D Price
Change %
CFWFF100%
-3.02%
NOA - CFWFF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
CLB - CFWFF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
TOLWF - CFWFF
29%
Poorly correlated
+16.59%
HAL - CFWFF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
NOV - CFWFF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
More

TOLWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOLWF has been loosely correlated with WHD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TOLWF jumps, then WHD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TOLWF
1D Price
Change %
TOLWF100%
+16.59%
WHD - TOLWF
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
CESDF - TOLWF
41%
Loosely correlated
+4.89%
LBRT - TOLWF
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
OII - TOLWF
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
ACDC - TOLWF
39%
Loosely correlated
-6.65%
More