CFXTF
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.03 (-12.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
18.48M
SSD
Price
$168.79
Change
+$1.79 (+1.07%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
8.55B
22 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CFXTF vs SSD

Header iconCFXTF vs SSD Comparison
Open Charts CFXTF vs SSDBanner chart's image
Conifex Timber
Price$0.22
Change-$0.03 (-12.00%)
Volume$1.8K
Capitalization18.48M
Simpson Manufacturing
Price$168.79
Change+$1.79 (+1.07%)
Volume$154.18K
Capitalization8.55B
CFXTF vs SSD Comparison Chart
Loading...
CFXTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CFXTF vs. SSD commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFXTF is a Hold and SSD is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CFXTF: $0.22 vs. SSD: $168.79)
Brand notoriety: CFXTF and SSD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Forest Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFXTF: 204% vs. SSD: 71%
Market capitalization -- CFXTF: $18.48M vs. SSD: $8.55B
CFXTF [@Forest Products] is valued at $18.48M. SSD’s [@Forest Products] market capitalization is $8.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Forest Products] industry ranges from $9.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Forest Products] industry is $2.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFXTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSSD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFXTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SSD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SSD is a better buy in the long-term than CFXTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFXTF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSD’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFXTF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SSD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SSD is a better buy in the short-term than CFXTF.

Price Growth

CFXTF (@Forest Products) experienced а -8.79% price change this week, while SSD (@Forest Products) price change was +6.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Forest Products industry was +2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

SSD is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Forest Products (+2.37% weekly)

Forest products are materials derived from forestry for direct consumption or commercial use. Wood, for example, has variety or uses ranging from generating wood fuel (e.g. in the form of firewood or charcoal) to providing structural materials for the construction of buildings and home improvement, or in the form of wood pulp that is used in the paper production. . Pulp and paper industry, in particular, creates high volume demand for the wood materials including both softwood and hardwood. Major companies making such products include Trex Company, Inc. (manufacturer of wood-alternative decking and railings), Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (makes engineered wood building products) and Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufactures and distributes wood and wood-alternative products, pressure-treated wood, and is a solid-sawn lumber buyer; makes products for use in home improvement and construction industries).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSD($8.55B) has a higher market cap than CFXTF($18.5M). SSD has higher P/E ratio than CFXTF: SSD (24.38) vs CFXTF (9.03). SSD YTD gains are higher at: 1.957 vs. CFXTF (-32.091). SSD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 554M vs. CFXTF (-20.28M). SSD has more cash in the bank: 430M vs. CFXTF (3.24M). CFXTF has less debt than SSD: CFXTF (65.6M) vs SSD (552M). SSD has higher revenues than CFXTF: SSD (2.21B) vs CFXTF (133M).
CFXTFSSDCFXTF / SSD
Capitalization18.5M8.55B0%
EBITDA-20.28M554M-4%
Gain YTD-32.0911.957-1,640%
P/E Ratio9.0324.3837%
Revenue133M2.21B6%
Total Cash3.24M430M1%
Total Debt65.6M552M12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFXTF vs SSD: Fundamental Ratings
CFXTF
SSD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
912
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9919
SMR RATING
1..100
9550
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9074
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
658
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SSD's Valuation (19) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFXTF (53) in the null industry. This means that SSD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFXTF’s over the last 12 months.

SSD's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for CFXTF (99) in the null industry. This means that SSD’s stock grew significantly faster than CFXTF’s over the last 12 months.

SSD's SMR Rating (50) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFXTF (95) in the null industry. This means that SSD’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFXTF’s over the last 12 months.

SSD's Price Growth Rating (74) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CFXTF (90) in the null industry. This means that SSD’s stock grew similarly to CFXTF’s over the last 12 months.

CFXTF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSD (58) in the Building Products industry. This means that CFXTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFXTFSSD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CFXTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EINC102.991.68
+1.66%
VanEck Energy Income ETF
CLSE23.800.25
+1.06%
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
DFUS65.200.62
+0.96%
Dimensional US Equity Market ETF
GMET22.160.19
+0.87%
VanEck Green Metals ETF
CGSD25.710.02
+0.08%
Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF

CFXTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CFXTF and CFPZF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CFXTF and CFPZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFXTF
1D Price
Change %
CFXTF100%
-8.79%
CFPZF - CFXTF
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.43%
IFSPF - CFXTF
10%
Poorly correlated
+5.40%
SSD - CFXTF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
ACAZF - CFXTF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
JCTC - CFXTF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.73%
More