Advertisement
CG vs CSGS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CG is a Hold and CSGS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCSGS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CSGS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSGS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CSGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.68% price change this week, while CSGS (@Computer Communications) price change was +2.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.36%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.46%.
Reported Earning Dates
CG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
CSGS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (+0.08% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
@Computer Communications (+0.15% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| CG | CSGS | CG / CSGS | |
| Capitalization | 23.3B | 1.86B | 1,255% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 208M | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.143 | 27.564 | 109% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.88 | 22.28 | 85% |
| Revenue | 3.71B | 1.21B | 307% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 146M | - |
| Total Debt | 10.5B | 565M | 1,858% |
CG | CSGS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 30 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CSGS's Valuation (15) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as CG (30) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.
CG's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CSGS (41) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to CSGS’s over the last 12 months.
CG's SMR Rating (30) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CSGS (33) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to CSGS’s over the last 12 months.
CG's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CSGS (52) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to CSGS’s over the last 12 months.
CSGS's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CG (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that CSGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CG’s over the last 12 months.
| CG | CSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 14 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 43% |
Advertisement
CSGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSGS has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSGS jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSGS | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| FRSH - CSGS | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| QTWO - CSGS | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.54% | ||
| DOX - CSGS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| RDVT - CSGS | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| SSNC - CSGS | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
More | ||||