CG
Price
$63.75
Change
-$1.18 (-1.82%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
23.49B
66 days until earnings call
FNNCF
Price
$7.68
Change
+$0.10 (+1.32%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
478.44M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CG vs FNNCF

Header iconCG vs FNNCF Comparison
Open Charts CG vs FNNCFBanner chart's image
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$63.75
Change-$1.18 (-1.82%)
Volume$3.1M
Capitalization23.49B
Financial 15 Split
Price$7.68
Change+$0.10 (+1.32%)
Volume$900
Capitalization478.44M
CG vs FNNCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CG vs. FNNCF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CG is a Hold and FNNCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CG: $63.75 vs. FNNCF: $7.68)
Brand notoriety: CG and FNNCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CG: 120% vs. FNNCF: 63%
Market capitalization -- CG: $23.49B vs. FNNCF: $478.44M
CG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $23.49B. FNNCF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $478.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFNNCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FNNCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CG and FNNCF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNNCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FNNCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNNCF is a better buy in the short-term than CG.

Price Growth

CG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while FNNCF (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

CG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CG($23.5B) has a higher market cap than FNNCF($478M). CG has higher P/E ratio than FNNCF: CG (18.64) vs FNNCF (3.23). CG YTD gains are higher at: 28.769 vs. FNNCF (19.626). CG has higher revenues than FNNCF: CG (3.71B) vs FNNCF (191M).
CGFNNCFCG / FNNCF
Capitalization23.5B478M4,916%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD28.76919.626147%
P/E Ratio18.643.23578%
Revenue3.71B191M1,942%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt10.5BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CG vs FNNCF: Fundamental Ratings
CG
FNNCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6495
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3477
SMR RATING
1..100
3023
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10034
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5045

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNNCF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CG (28) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FNNCF’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNNCF (77) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNCF's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as CG (30) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FNNCF’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FNNCF (45) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNCF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CG (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FNNCF’s stock grew significantly faster than CG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGFNNCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLT18.311.21
+7.08%
T-REX 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF
KPDD23.910.31
+1.31%
KraneShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF
GOOP32.610.12
+0.36%
Kurv Yield Premium Str Google ETF
FIBR88.92N/A
N/A
iShares U.S. Fixed Inc Bal Rsk Sysmc ETF
QGRO111.48N/A
N/A
American Century US Quality Growth ETF

FNNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNNCF and TPG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNNCF and TPG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNNCF
1D Price
Change %
FNNCF100%
+1.32%
TPG - FNNCF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
PAX - FNNCF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CG - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
CYMBF - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARES - FNNCF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
More