CG
Price
$35.89
Change
-$2.82 (-7.28%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
16.93B
25 days until earnings call
HLNE
Price
$135.66
Change
-$5.23 (-3.71%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.5B
46 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CG vs HLNE

Header iconCG vs HLNE Comparison
Open Charts CG vs HLNEBanner chart's image
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$35.89
Change-$2.82 (-7.28%)
Volume$7.13M
Capitalization16.93B
Hamilton Lane
Price$135.66
Change-$5.23 (-3.71%)
Volume$1.1M
Capitalization4.5B
CG vs HLNE Comparison Chart
Loading...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLNE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CG vs. HLNE commentary
Apr 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CG is a Hold and HLNE is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CG: $35.89 vs. HLNE: $135.66)
Brand notoriety: CG and HLNE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CG: 239% vs. HLNE: 193%
Market capitalization -- CG: $16.93B vs. HLNE: $4.5B
CG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.93B. HLNE’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLNE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HLNE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLNE is a better buy in the long-term than CG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLNE’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HLNE’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the short-term than HLNE.

Price Growth

CG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -16.83% price change this week, while HLNE (@Investment Managers) price change was -7.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -5.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

CG is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

HLNE is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-5.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CG($16.9B) has a higher market cap than HLNE($4.5B). CG has higher P/E ratio than HLNE: CG (77.57) vs HLNE (34.22). HLNE YTD gains are higher at: -8.045 vs. CG (-28.435). HLNE has less debt than CG: HLNE (277M) vs CG (9.26B). CG has higher revenues than HLNE: CG (1.32B) vs HLNE (490M).
CGHLNECG / HLNE
Capitalization16.9B4.5B375%
EBITDAN/A271M-
Gain YTD-28.435-8.045353%
P/E Ratio77.5734.22227%
Revenue1.32B490M270%
Total CashN/A164M-
Total Debt9.26B277M3,342%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CG vs HLNE: Fundamental Ratings
CG
HLNE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2631
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5224
SMR RATING
1..100
1226
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8559
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10072
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CG's Valuation (34) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as HLNE (40). This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to HLNE’s over the last 12 months.

HLNE's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CG (52). This means that HLNE’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's SMR Rating (12) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as HLNE (26). This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to HLNE’s over the last 12 months.

HLNE's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CG (85). This means that HLNE’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

HLNE's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CG (100). This means that HLNE’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGHLNE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLNE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DZZ1.66-0.01
-0.72%
DB Gold Double Short ETN
DES29.23-1.16
-3.82%
WisdomTree US SmallCap Dividend ETF
PFD10.52-0.54
-4.88%
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Fund
EAD6.32-0.44
-6.51%
Allspring Income Opportunities Fund
UFO19.61-1.46
-6.93%
Procure Space ETF

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with TPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then TPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
-7.28%
TPG - CG
81%
Closely correlated
-3.17%
KKR - CG
78%
Closely correlated
-9.52%
BX - CG
77%
Closely correlated
-6.06%
APO - CG
75%
Closely correlated
-11.96%
OWL - CG
75%
Closely correlated
-11.22%
More

HLNE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLNE has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLNE jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLNE
1D Price
Change %
HLNE100%
-3.71%
JHG - HLNE
72%
Closely correlated
-7.81%
TPG - HLNE
71%
Closely correlated
-3.17%
BN - HLNE
70%
Closely correlated
-8.16%
KKR - HLNE
69%
Closely correlated
-9.52%
APO - HLNE
69%
Closely correlated
-11.96%
More