CG
Price
$63.45
Change
+$1.14 (+1.83%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
16.93B
10 days until earnings call
MNGPF
Price
$2.50
Change
+$0.01 (+0.40%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
3.94B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CG vs MNGPF

Header iconCG vs MNGPF Comparison
Open Charts CG vs MNGPFBanner chart's image
Carlyle Group (The)
Price$63.45
Change+$1.14 (+1.83%)
Volume$2.16M
Capitalization16.93B
Man Group
Price$2.50
Change+$0.01 (+0.40%)
Volume$6K
Capitalization3.94B
CG vs MNGPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CG vs. MNGPF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CG is a Buy and MNGPF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CG: $63.45 vs. MNGPF: $2.50)
Brand notoriety: CG and MNGPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CG: 93% vs. MNGPF: 124%
Market capitalization -- CG: $16.93B vs. MNGPF: $3.94B
CG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.93B. MNGPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNGPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MNGPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the long-term than MNGPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNGPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MNGPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNGPF is a better buy in the short-term than CG.

Price Growth

CG (@Investment Managers) experienced а +5.45% price change this week, while MNGPF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

CG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.66% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CG($16.9B) has a higher market cap than MNGPF($3.94B). CG has higher P/E ratio than MNGPF: CG (77.57) vs MNGPF (15.88). CG YTD gains are higher at: 27.461 vs. MNGPF (-0.384). MNGPF has less debt than CG: MNGPF (423M) vs CG (9.26B). CG has higher revenues than MNGPF: CG (1.32B) vs MNGPF (1.17B).
CGMNGPFCG / MNGPF
Capitalization16.9B3.94B429%
EBITDAN/A377M-
Gain YTD27.461-0.384-7,153%
P/E Ratio77.5715.88489%
Revenue1.32B1.17B113%
Total CashN/A180M-
Total Debt9.26B423M2,188%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CG vs MNGPF: Fundamental Ratings
CG
MNGPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9539
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3244
SMR RATING
1..100
2457
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3855
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10092
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNGPF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CG (44) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that MNGPF’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as MNGPF (44) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to MNGPF’s over the last 12 months.

CG's SMR Rating (24) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNGPF (57) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNGPF’s over the last 12 months.

CG's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as MNGPF (55) in the null industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to MNGPF’s over the last 12 months.

MNGPF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CG (100) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that MNGPF’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGMNGPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNGPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VETZ19.740.02
+0.13%
Academy Veteran Impact ETF
JANM31.990.01
+0.03%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Jan
FXL159.86N/A
N/A
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX® ETF
IDAT36.81N/A
N/A
iShares Future Cloud 5G and Tech ETF
AMZY16.52-0.01
-0.06%
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
+1.83%
KKR - CG
87%
Closely correlated
+1.31%
TPG - CG
86%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
ARES - CG
84%
Closely correlated
+3.13%
BX - CG
83%
Closely correlated
-0.01%
JHG - CG
83%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
More

MNGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNGPF and CG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNGPF and CG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNGPF
1D Price
Change %
MNGPF100%
N/A
CG - MNGPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
MGPUF - MNGPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGGNY - MNGPF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
PGPHF - MNGPF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
MGHCF - MNGPF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More