Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGACX vs RSEBX
CGACX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts CGACX vs RSEBX
Calvert Global Energy Solutions C
Price$12.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.98M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$72.75
Change-$0.26 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.91B
CGACX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGACX vs. RSEBX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGACX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 81.9B vs. CGACX (151M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than CGACX: RSEBX (0.23) vs CGACX (0.05). CGACX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: CGACX (18 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). CGACX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). CGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGACX: RSEBX (250) vs CGACX (1000). CGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.06 vs. RSEBX (9.05). CGACX return over 5 years is better than : 38.91 vs. RSEBX (13.72).
| CGACX | RSEBX | CGACX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.45 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.45 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.615 | 11.912 | 215% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 151M | 81.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.23 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.06 | 9.05 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.54 | 35.57 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.91 | 13.72 | 284% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.86 | 54.12 | 221% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement