Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs GHTA
CGBL vs GHTA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. GHTA commentary
Oct 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a StrongBuy and GHTA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.59B vs. GHTA (43.9M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than GHTA: CGBL (11.232) vs GHTA (8.407). CGBL was incepted earlier than GHTA: CGBL (2 years) vs GHTA (4 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than GHTA (1.49). GHTA has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | GHTA | CGBL / GHTA | |
| Gain YTD | 11.232 | 8.407 | 134% |
| Net Assets | 3.59B | 43.9M | 8,178% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.49 | 22% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 129.00 | 19% |
| Yield | 1.96 | 2.24 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | GHTA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 17 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -1.38% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -4.28% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -5.03% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -4.31% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -4.33% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 75% Closely correlated | -4.98% | ||
More | ||||
GHTA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GHTA and ROK have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GHTA and ROK's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GHTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHTA | 100% | -0.63% | ||
| ROK - GHTA | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.64% | ||
| SIRI - GHTA | 8% Poorly correlated | -5.42% | ||
| NU - GHTA | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.93% | ||
| OMAB - GHTA | 2% Poorly correlated | +2.38% | ||
| BSAC - GHTA | -0% Poorly correlated | -1.61% | ||
More | ||||