Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs GHTA
CGBL vs GHTA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. GHTA commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Hold and GHTA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.9B vs. GHTA (44.7M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than GHTA: CGBL (11.362) vs GHTA (9.162). CGBL was incepted earlier than GHTA: CGBL (2 years) vs GHTA (4 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than GHTA (1.49). GHTA has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | GHTA | CGBL / GHTA | |
| Gain YTD | 11.362 | 9.162 | 124% |
| Net Assets | 3.9B | 44.7M | 8,732% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.49 | 22% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 129.00 | 19% |
| Yield | 1.95 | 2.28 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | GHTA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 20 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FFOX | 27.02 | 0.17 | +0.63% |
| Fundx Future Fund Opportunities ETF | |||
| RSPF | 73.62 | 0.10 | +0.14% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Fincl ETF | |||
| IGEB | 45.65 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Investment Grade Systmtc Bd ETF | |||
| DEED | 21.53 | -0.06 | -0.28% |
| First Trust Securitized Plus ETF | |||
| MCHS | 32.49 | -0.14 | -0.43% |
| Matthews China Discovery Active ETF | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +2.32% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||
GHTA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GHTA and OMAB have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GHTA and OMAB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GHTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHTA | 100% | -0.30% | ||
| OMAB - GHTA | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
| ITUB - GHTA | -5% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
| NU - GHTA | -5% Poorly correlated | +2.22% | ||
| ROK - GHTA | -6% Poorly correlated | +1.77% | ||
| FMX - GHTA | -7% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||