CGBL | GHTA | CGBL / GHTA | |
Gain YTD | -2.811 | 1.727 | -163% |
Net Assets | 1.88B | 40.3M | 4,655% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.61 | 20% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 129.00 | 2% |
Yield | 2.00 | 2.39 | 84% |
Fund Existence | 2 years | 3 years | - |
CGBL | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago43% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago51% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago38% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CGBL | 100% | -2.92% | ||
BX - CGBL | 72% Closely correlated | -9.86% | ||
AVGO - CGBL | 71% Closely correlated | -10.51% | ||
APO - CGBL | 68% Closely correlated | -12.77% | ||
AMAT - CGBL | 67% Closely correlated | -8.28% | ||
TSM - CGBL | 65% Loosely correlated | -7.64% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GHTA and AGNC have been poorly correlated (+-7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GHTA and AGNC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GHTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GHTA | 100% | -1.68% | ||
AGNC - GHTA | -7% Poorly correlated | -1.48% |