Ad is loading...
CGBL vs GHTA
CGBL vs GHTA Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs GHTA
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$31.35
Change-$0.87 (-2.70%)
Volume$1.11K
CapitalizationN/A
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF
Price$28.57
Change+$0.09 (+0.32%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
CGBL vs GHTA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. GHTA commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Hold and GHTA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 1.36B vs. GHTA (40.1M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than GHTA: CGBL (19.408) vs GHTA (5.674). CGBL was incepted earlier than GHTA: CGBL (1 year) vs GHTA (3 years). GHTA has a higher turnover CGBL (3.00) vs CGBL (3.00).
| CGBL | GHTA | CGBL / GHTA | |
| Gain YTD | 19.408 | 5.674 | 342% |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 40.1M | 3,382% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 450.00 | 1% |
| Yield | N/A | 1.74 | - |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | GHTA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with AVGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then AVGO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.65% | ||
| AVGO - CGBL | 69% Closely correlated | -3.91% | ||
| AMAT - CGBL | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| TSM - CGBL | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| ASML - CGBL | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.84% | ||
More | ||||
GHTA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GHTA and AGNC have been poorly correlated (+-7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GHTA and AGNC's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GHTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHTA | 100% | -0.13% | ||
| AGNC - GHTA | -7% Poorly correlated | -0.83% |