Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
CGBL vs GHTA
CGBL vs GHTA Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs GHTA
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$31.16
Change-$0.30 (-0.95%)
Volume$364.27K
CapitalizationN/A
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF
Price$28.89
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
Volume$816
CapitalizationN/A
CGBL vs GHTA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. GHTA commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a StrongSell and GHTA is a Sell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 1.15B vs. GHTA (39.7M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than GHTA: CGBL (15.480) vs GHTA (4.760). CGBL was incepted earlier than GHTA: CGBL (1 year) vs GHTA (3 years). GHTA has a higher turnover CGBL (3.00) vs CGBL (3.00).
| CGBL | GHTA | CGBL / GHTA | |
| Gain YTD | 15.480 | 4.760 | 325% |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 39.7M | 2,892% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 3.00 | 450.00 | 1% |
| Yield | N/A | 1.74 | - |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | GHTA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 34% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 24 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with AVGO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then AVGO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.95% | ||
| AVGO - CGBL | 71% Closely correlated | -3.25% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 67% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| AMAT - CGBL | 64% Loosely correlated | -9.20% | ||
| ASML - CGBL | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.95% | ||
| TSM - CGBL | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.32% | ||
More | ||||
GHTA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GHTA and AGNC have been poorly correlated (+-7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GHTA and AGNC's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GHTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHTA | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| AGNC - GHTA | -7% Poorly correlated | +0.74% |