Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs MVFD
CGBL vs MVFD Comparison
Open Charts CGBL vs MVFD
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$34.33
Change+$0.08 (+0.23%)
Volume$716.93K
Net Assets3.9B
Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF
Price$27.06
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
Volume$6.78K
Net Assets76.6M
CGBL vs MVFD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. MVFD commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Hold and MVFD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.9B vs. MVFD (76.6M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than MVFD: CGBL (11.362) vs MVFD (5.251). CGBL was incepted earlier than MVFD: CGBL (2 years) vs MVFD (2 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than MVFD (1.19). MVFD has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | MVFD | CGBL / MVFD | |
| Gain YTD | 11.362 | 5.251 | 216% |
| Net Assets | 3.9B | 76.6M | 5,095% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 1.19 | 28% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 264.00 | 9% |
| Yield | 1.95 | 1.32 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | MVFD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 88% | 8 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +2.32% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||
MVFD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MVFD has been loosely correlated with BRSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MVFD jumps, then BRSL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MVFD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MVFD | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| BRSL - MVFD | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| ALLE - MVFD | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
| SNA - MVFD | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
| SEIC - MVFD | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.23% | ||
| KNTK - MVFD | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.11% | ||
More | ||||