Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGBL vs PDT
CGBL vs PDT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGBL vs. PDT commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGBL is a Hold and PDT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.86B vs. PDT (692M). CGBL has a higher annual dividend yield than PDT: CGBL (11.102) vs PDT (8.286). CGBL was incepted earlier than PDT: CGBL (2 years) vs PDT (36 years). CGBL (0.33) has a lower expense ratio than PDT (2.31). PDT has a higher turnover CGBL (24.00) vs CGBL (24.00).
| CGBL | PDT | CGBL / PDT | |
| Gain YTD | 11.102 | 8.286 | 134% |
| Net Assets | 3.86B | 692M | 558% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 2.31 | 14% |
| Turnover | 24.00 | 27.00 | 89% |
| Yield | 1.95 | 4.74 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 36 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CGBL | PDT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 88% | 8 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 16 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RSPF | 73.52 | 0.13 | +0.17% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Fincl ETF | |||
| FFOX | 26.85 | 0.05 | +0.17% |
| Fundx Future Fund Opportunities ETF | |||
| DEED | 21.59 | 0.03 | +0.14% |
| First Trust Securitized Plus ETF | |||
| IGEB | 45.65 | 0.03 | +0.07% |
| iShares Investment Grade Systmtc Bd ETF | |||
| MCHS | 32.63 | -0.48 | -1.46% |
| Matthews China Discovery Active ETF | |||
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
More | ||||