Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKCX
CGCYX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKCX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$51.93
Change+$0.12 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.03M
Fidelity China Region
Price$56.86
Change+$0.59 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
CGCYX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FHKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. CGCYX (56M). FHKCX (0.98) and CGCYX (0.96) have matching dividends . CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). CGCYX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKCX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.14 vs. CGCYX (27.71). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.82 vs. CGCYX (-31.07).
| CGCYX | FHKCX | CGCYX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.91 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.91 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.292 | 44.690 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 56M | 1.6B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.98 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.71 | 33.14 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.64 | 99.80 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.07 | 14.82 | -210% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.51 | - |