Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKCX
CGCYX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKCX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$44.27
Change-$0.13 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.47M
Fidelity China Region
Price$47.30
Change+$0.56 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
CGCYX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a StrongBuy and FHKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. CGCYX (48.5M). FHKCX (1.17) and CGCYX (1.13) have matching dividends . CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: CGCYX (8 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). CGCYX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKCX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.08 vs. FHKCX (35.79). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.90 vs. CGCYX (-34.50).
| CGCYX | FHKCX | CGCYX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.91 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.91 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.227 | 20.185 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.5M | 1.31B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.17 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.08 | 35.79 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.16 | 45.00 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.50 | 0.90 | -3,816% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement