Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKCX
CGCYX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKCX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$51.34
Change+$0.78 (+1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.43M
Fidelity China Region
Price$53.58
Change+$0.39 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
CGCYX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a StrongBuy and FHKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. CGCYX (54.4M). FHKCX (1.11) and CGCYX (1.06) have matching dividends . CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). CGCYX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKCX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.54 vs. FHKCX (48.77). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.59 vs. CGCYX (-29.23).
| CGCYX | FHKCX | CGCYX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.91 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.91 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.908 | 36.770 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.4M | 1.39B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.11 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.54 | 48.77 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.81 | 76.78 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.23 | 11.59 | -252% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement