Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKIX
CGCYX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKIX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$51.93
Change+$0.12 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56.03M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$56.41
Change+$0.58 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
CGCYX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKIX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FHKIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. CGCYX (56M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: FHKIX (1.02) vs CGCYX (0.96). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FHKIX (17 years). CGCYX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKIX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.16 vs. CGCYX (27.71). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 14.71 vs. CGCYX (-31.07).
| CGCYX | FHKIX | CGCYX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.90 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.90 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.292 | 44.712 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 56M | 1.6B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 1.02 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.71 | 33.16 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.64 | 99.89 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.07 | 14.71 | -211% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement