Ad is loading...
CGCYX vs FHKIX
CGCYX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKIX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$39.87
Change+$0.10 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.1M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$38.88
Change+$0.22 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
CGCYX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKIX commentary
May 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Buy and FHKIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. CGCYX (45.1M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: FHKIX (1.44) vs CGCYX (1.25). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: CGCYX (8 years) vs FHKIX (17 years). CGCYX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKIX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.08 vs. FHKIX (15.04). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 8.56 vs. CGCYX (-22.55).
| CGCYX | FHKIX | CGCYX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.90 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.90 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.690 | 0.207 | 3,709% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.1M | 1.1B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.44 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.08 | 15.04 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.03 | 18.23 | -44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.55 | 8.56 | -264% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 6.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers