Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKIX
CGCYX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKIX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$42.56
Change-$0.13 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.97M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$44.60
Change+$0.10 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
CGCYX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKIX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Hold and FHKIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. CGCYX (47M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: FHKIX (1.27) vs CGCYX (1.16). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: CGCYX (8 years) vs FHKIX (17 years). CGCYX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKIX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.86 vs. FHKIX (19.56). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.51 vs. CGCYX (-31.94).
| CGCYX | FHKIX | CGCYX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.90 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.90 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.245 | 15.604 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47M | 1.24B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.27 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.86 | 19.56 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.62 | 31.31 | -31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.94 | 3.51 | -911% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement