Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKIX
CGCYX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKIX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$51.34
Change+$0.78 (+1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.43M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$53.16
Change+$0.39 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
CGCYX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKIX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a StrongBuy and FHKIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. CGCYX (54.4M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: FHKIX (1.15) vs CGCYX (1.06). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FHKIX (17 years). CGCYX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKIX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.54 vs. FHKIX (48.78). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 11.48 vs. CGCYX (-29.23).
| CGCYX | FHKIX | CGCYX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.90 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.90 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.908 | 36.781 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.4M | 1.39B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.15 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.54 | 48.78 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.81 | 76.87 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.23 | 11.48 | -255% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 100.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement