Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKIX
CGCYX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKIX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$44.27
Change-$0.13 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.47M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$46.93
Change+$0.55 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
CGCYX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKIX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a StrongBuy and FHKIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. CGCYX (48.5M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: FHKIX (1.21) vs CGCYX (1.13). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: CGCYX (8 years) vs FHKIX (17 years). CGCYX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKIX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.08 vs. FHKIX (35.82). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 0.82 vs. CGCYX (-34.50).
| CGCYX | FHKIX | CGCYX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.90 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.90 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.227 | 20.218 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.5M | 1.31B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.21 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.08 | 35.82 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.16 | 45.06 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.50 | 0.82 | -4,219% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement