Ad is loading...
CGCYX vs FHKIX
CGCYX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKIX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$36.56
Change-$0.46 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$38.34
Change-$0.56 (-1.44%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
CGCYX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKIX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a Buy and FHKIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. CGCYX (44.4M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than CGCYX: FHKIX (1.81) vs CGCYX (0.82). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: CGCYX (8 years) vs FHKIX (17 years). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FHKIX (24.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKIX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.32 vs. CGCYX (14.27). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 5.37 vs. CGCYX (-30.39).
| CGCYX | FHKIX | CGCYX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.756 | 24.170 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.4M | 1.11B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.81 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.27 | 26.32 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | -33.43 | -3.92 | 853% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.39 | 5.37 | -566% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 38.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...