Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CGCYX vs FHKTX
CGCYX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts CGCYX vs FHKTX
Columbia Greater China Inst3
Price$51.34
Change+$0.78 (+1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.43M
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$52.23
Change+$0.38 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
CGCYX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGCYX vs. FHKTX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGCYX is a StrongBuy and FHKTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. CGCYX (54.4M). CGCYX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: CGCYX (1.06) vs FHKTX (0.88). CGCYX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: CGCYX (9 years) vs FHKTX (17 years). FHKTX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CGCYX (1.24). CGCYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGCYX: FHKTX (0) vs CGCYX (1000000). CGCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.54 vs. FHKTX (47.97). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 8.21 vs. CGCYX (-29.23).
| CGCYX | FHKTX | CGCYX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.43 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.43 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.908 | 36.268 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.4M | 1.39B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.88 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.54 | 47.97 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.81 | 73.96 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.23 | 8.21 | -356% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement